Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Marriage Fam. 2015 Apr 7;77(4):996–1015. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12197

Table 4.

OLS regression results by two-parent family type, internalizing behavior problems

Married
Biological-
Father Families
Cohabiting
Biological-
Father Families
Married
Stepfather
Families
Cohabiting
Stepfather
Families
Family income:
 Income (ln) −0.06+ (0.03) −0.06 (0.04) −0.18+ (0.10) −0.01 (0.04)
Parental relationships quality:
 BF/SF treatment of mother (standardized) −0.18*** (0.04) −0.17** (0.05) −0.41+ (0.21) −0.23* (0.08)
 Coparenting quality (standardized) −0.07+ (0.04) 0.01 (0.07) −0.39*b (0.16) −0.05 (0.06)
Parenting quality:
 Mother spanking frequency (standardized) 0.01 (0.04) 0.09 (0.07) 0.08 (0.12) 0.14* (0.06)
 Mother engagement with child (standardized) −0.04 (0.04) −0.13+ (0.07) −0.07 (0.11) −0.07 (0.06)
 BF/SF spanking frequency (standardized) 0.03 (0.04) 0.05 (0.06) 0.06 (0.15) −0.01 (0.09)
 BF/SF engagement with child (standardized) 0.06 (0.04) 0.03 (0.07) 0.13 (0.13) 0.12+ (0.07)
 Constant 0.95* (0.42) 0.72 (0.54) 4.91*** (1.28) 0.23 (0.57)
Percent of total sample 51% 22% 6% 21%
Observations per imputed dataset 898 – 900 379 – 380 111 – 112 361 – 364

Note: 1749 – 1753observations per imputed dataset. Coefficients (and standard errors) presented. Outcome has been standardized to have a mean of 0 and standard deviation of 1 in the full sample. The models also control for the family characteristics listed in Table 1.

a

Differs from married biological-father families at p<0.05.

b

Differs from cohabiting biological-father families at p<0. 05.

c

Differs from married stepfather families at p<0.05.