Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Marriage Fam. 2015 Apr 7;77(4):996–1015. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12197

Table 5.

OLS regression results by two-parent family type, externalizing behavior problems

Married
Biological-
Father Families
Cohabiting
Biological-
Father Families
Married
Stepfather
Families
Cohabiting
Stepfather
Families
Family income:
 Income (ln) −0.02 (0.03) −0.00 (0.04) −0.05 (0.10) 0.01 (0.04)
Parental relationship quality:
 BF/SF treatment of mother (standardized) −0.11** (0.03) −0.13* (0.05) −0.23 (0.19) −0.18* (0.09)
 Coparenting quality (standardized) −0.05 (0.04) −0.06 (0.06) −0.19 (0.16) −0.13+ (0.07)
Parenting quality:
 Mother spanking frequency (standardized) 0.12** (0.04) 0.25*** (0.06) 0.03 (0.11) 0.23*** (0.06)
 Mother engagement with child (standardized) 0.02 (0.04) −0.17*a (0.06) −0.10 (0.11) 0.00b (0.07)
 BF/SF spanking frequency (standardized) 0.07* (0.04) 0.09 (0.06) 0.21 (0.14) 0.07 (0.10)
 BF/SF engagement with child (standardized) −0.04 (0.04) 0.12 (0.07) 0.02 (0.13) 0.15*a (0.07)
 Constant 0.39 (0.40) −0.06 (0.51) 2.05 (1.26) 0.21 (0.62)
Percent of total sample 51% 22% 6% 21%
Observations per imputed dataset 898 – 900 379 – 380 111 – 112 361 – 364

Note: 1749 – 1753observations per imputed dataset. Coefficients (and standard errors) presented. Outcome has been standardized to have a mean of 0 and standard deviation of 1 in the full sample. The models also control for the family characteristics listed in Table 1.

a

Differs from married biological-father families at p<0.05.

b

Differs from cohabiting biological-father families at p<0. 05.

c

Differs from married stepfather families at p<0.05.