Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul;18(5):673–681. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.03.1792

Table 1.

Precision input value for structure with evidence available for all contrasts.

(a) Evidence scenario and description
(b) Precision (variance) input by level of evidence
(c)V^ABobtained for an IC using values in (b)
Scenario Description Direct A vs. B (Fig. 1A) All first-order indirect (Fig. 1D) All second-order indirect (Fig. 1F) Direct evidence First-order IC Second-order IC
1 Evidence available in equal amounts for all comparisons P = 1 (V = 1) P = 1 (V = 1) P = 1 (V = 1) 1 2 3
2 Sparse network; a few small trials/weak evidence available for direct and first order. Stronger evidence for second order P = 0.5 (V = 2) P = 0.75 (V = 1.33) P = 1 (V = 1) 2 2.66 3.66
3 Few trials/weak direct evidence on focal treatments. More evidence for first- and second-order comparisons P = 0.5 (V = 2) P = 2 (V = 0.5) P = 5 (V = 0.2) 2 1 1.2
4 Strong direct evidence available for focal treatments. All other evidence weaker P = 5 (V = 0.2) P = 2 (V = 0.5) P = 1 (V = 1) 0.2 1 2
5 Well-populated network; several trials. Strong evidence available for each comparison P = 5 (V = 0.2) P = 3 (V = 0.33) P = 3 (V = 0.33) 0.2 0.66 0.99

Notes. Evidence scenarios and corresponding precision input values for each level of evidence in the six-treatment network. “All first-order indirect” refers to evidence on a treatment contrast that contributes to a first-order IC, i.e., A vs. C, …, B vs. F. The variance VABI for a first-order IC is formed, e.g., VABI=VACD+VBCD “All second-order indirect” refers to evidence on a treatment contrast that contributes to a second-order IC, i.e., C vs. D, …, E vs. F. The variance VABI for a second-order IC is formed, e.g., VABI=VADD+VCDD+VBCD.

IC, indirect comparison; P, precision; V, variance.