Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct;28(10):1433–1441. doi: 10.5713/ajas.15.0091

Table 2.

Effects of nitrate on the relative abundance of bacterial phyla (% of total sequences) using NGS technology

Treatments SEM p-value Contrast1


0NR 1NR 2NR PL PQ
Bacteroidetes 57.36 56.81 53.35 2.25 0.44 0.25 0.62
Firmicutes 33.12 29.82 34.24 2.97 0.58 0.80 0.33
Proteobacteria 3.30 5.20 6.34 1.01 0.18 0.08 0.77
Unclassified 2.43b 3.11a 2.28b 0.13 0.01 0.45 <0.01
Tenericutes 0.81b 1.32a 0.70b 0.12 0.03 0.56 0.01
Fibrobacteres 0.71 1.06 0.83 0.20 0.49 0.70 0.27
TM7 0.43 0.64 0.56 0.07 0.22 0.25 0.18
Spirochaetes 0.36b 0.69a 0.43b 0.07 0.03 0.48 0.01
SR1 0.44 0.45 0.53 0.18 0.93 0.74 0.87
Verrucomicrobia 0.35a 0.20b 0.14b 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.39
Synergistetes 0.14 0.15 0.20 0.03 0.43 0.24 0.63
Cyanobacteria 0.18b 0.22a 0.09b 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01
Actinobacteria 0.16 0.09 0.18 0.02 0.08 0.57 0.03
Elusimicrobia 0.12 0.07 0.05 0.02 0.09 0.04 0.60
Lentisphaerae 0.06 0.12 0.05 0.02 0.09 0.68 0.04
WPS 0.02 0.02 0.02 <0.01 0.33 0.21 0.45

NGS, next-generation DNA sequencing; 0NR, control; 1NR, 1% nitrate; 2NR, 2% nitrate; SEM, standard error of the mean.

1

PL is liner tendency; PQ is quadratic tendency.

Different superscripts in the same row represent significant differences (p<0.05).