Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct;28(10):1433–1441. doi: 10.5713/ajas.15.0091

Table 5.

Influence of nitrate on total bacteria, cellulolytic and nitrate-reducing bacteria abundance using qPCR technology

Treatments SEM p-value Contrast1


0NR 1NR 2NR PL PQ
Total Bacteria (log copies) 11.36 11.18 11.21 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.13
R. flavefaciens (%) 0.3463b 0.7889a 0.6600a 0.041 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
R. ablus (%) 0.0115 0.0185 0.0266 0.003 0.06 0.02 0.9
F. succinogenes (%) 0.0392b 0.2240a 0.2687a 0.052 0.02 0.01 0.29
S. ruminantium (%) 0.2778b 0.6176a 0.4453ab 0.080 0.02 0.30 0.01
C. fetus (%) 0.00003b 0.0002b 0.0015a <0.001 <0.01 <0.01 0.05
M. succiniciproducens (%) 0.0006b 0.0016b 0.0068a 0.002 0.04 0.02 0.29
W. succinogenes (%) 0.0031 0.0064 0.0041 0.001 0.14 0.21 0.13
V. parvula (%) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0002 <0.001 0.82 0.67 0.66

qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction; 0NR, control; 1NR, 1% nitrate; 2NR, 2% nitrate; SEM, standard error of the mean.

1

PL is liner tendency; PQ is quadratic tendency.

Different superscripts in the same row represent significant differences (p<0.05).