Table 4.
Treatment2 | SEM | Significance (p-value) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
LC 0 | LC 0.1% | |||||||
|
|
|
||||||
ALA 0 | ALA 0.03% | ALA 0 | ALA 0.03% | LC | ALA | LC×ALA3 | ||
TC (mmol/L) | 3.39 | 3.20 | 3.09 | 2.99 | 0.214 | <0.01 | 0.088 | 0.599 |
TG (mmol/L) | 0.96 | 0.79 | 0.88 | 0.80 | 0.023 | 0.448 | 0.004 | 0.297 |
HDL-C (mmol/L) | 0.89 | 0.83 | 1.06 | 0.93 | 0.158 | 0.094 | 0.191 | 0.883 |
LDL-C (mmol/L) | 3.03 | 2.65 | 3.10 | 2.62 | 0.268 | 0.809 | <0.01 | 0.552 |
VLDL-C (mmol/L) | 0.44 | 0.39 | 0.44 | 0.42 | 0.037 | 0.456 | 0.092 | 0.496 |
SEM, pooled standard error of the means; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; VLDL-C, very low density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Data were means of 10 pigs from per treatment.
A 2×2 factorial arrangement with 2 supplemental levels of LC (0 or 0.1%) and 2 supplemental levels of ALA (0 or 0.03%) in basal diets.
LC×ALA, the interaction between LC and ALA.