Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2015 Jun 11;118:667–675. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.016

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(a) Three selected DWI images (of an axial slice) reconstructed by the conventional SENSE algorithm. (b) DWI reconstructed by the developed 3D MUSE algorithm. This comparison shows that the undesirable noise amplification associated with the conventional SENSE method (the top row) can be largely avoided in 3D MUSE produced images (the bottom row).