Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 6;38(5):497–503. doi: 10.1007/s40618-014-0204-4

Table 2.

Table of outcome measures

Total dose (IU) No. of retrieved oocytes
rFSH (means ± std) HMG (means ± std) rFSH (means ± std) HMG (means ± std)
Jansen et al. [12] 1,410 ± 228 1,365 ± 228 11.2 ± 6.8 8.3 ± 6.2
Gordon et al. [13] 2,025 ± 350 1,981 ± 570 12 ± 6 10 ± 7
NG et al. [14] 1,800 ± 270 1,650 ± 270 12.6 ± 8.9 9.6 ± 8.1
Strehler et al. [15] 2,150 ± 797 1,516 ± 545 12.29 ± 7.8 9.67 ± 5.92
Westergaard et al. [16] 2,242 ± 375 2,280 ± 435 12.9 ± 6.8 12.9 ± 6.7
Balash et al. [17] 2,449 ± 885 1,922 ± 379 11.79 ± 4.55 9.1 ± 4.35
Kilani et al. [18] 2,025 ± 795 1,680 ± 530 6.8 ± 3.9 7.9 ± 4.6
Rashidi et al. [19] 2,138 ± 800 2,250 ± 800 8.7 ± 8.5 9 ± 6.2
Andersen et al. [20] 2,385 ± 622 2,508 ± 729 11.8 ± 5.7 10.0 ± 5.4
Bosch et al. [21] 2,624 ± 801 2,481 ± 994 14.4 ± 8.1 11.3 ± 6.0
Hompes et al. [22] 1,759.7 1,821.0 10.56 7.76
Devroey et al. [23] 1,353 ± 296 1,433 ± 371 10.7 ± 5.8 9.1 ± 5.2
Ye et al. [24] 2,162.7 ± 399.4 2,219 ± 502.7 10.2 ± 5.2 7.2 ± 4.2