Table 2.
GER | FIN | FRA | BEL | ENG | DEN | NEL | SCO | WAL | HUN | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Future society | ✓ | ✓✓ | ✓ | |||||||
GHG emissions | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
Climate model | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
Regional scenarios | ✓✓ | ✓ | ||||||||
Impact model | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||
Local impacts | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
Total score | 10 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Average score | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The table shows the different levels of the cascade of uncertainty and gives a qualitative assessment of the inclusion/exclusion of each one in the different NAS. ✓✓ type of uncertainty mentioned and some more detail/explanation given (2 points), ✓ type of uncertainty mentioned (1 point), blank cells signify that the type of uncertainty was not mentioned (0 points)