Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 May 18;41(4):898–903. doi: 10.1037/a0039314

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Scatterplot showing the correlation between aesthetically-preferred complexity, APC, and visual-object working memory, VOWM (measured in d′). APC was computed for each participant as the center-of-mass of the quadratic fit to the aesthetic-rating-vs.-complexity-rating function (see text for details). On the right side examples of aesthetic-rating-vs.-complexity-rating functions for participants with high (top), medium (middle), and low (bottom) VOWM are shown along with the corresponding quadratic fits and APCs (R2 indicating the goodness of fit).