Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Rev Neurol. 2015 Feb 17;11(3):134–142. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.14

Table 1.

Efficacy ranking of approved therapies for multiple sclerosis*

Drug Era of
development
Mechanism of action Key considerations
Most effective

Natalizumab Second Monoclonal antibody against
integrin-α4 in leukocytes
Risk of PML must be assessed via presence of JCV antibodies
Substantial risk of relapse after discontinuation

Highly effective

Fingolimod Second Sphingosine S1P receptor
modulator
Cardiac complications preclude use in individuals aged ≥50 years,
and in those with history of cardiac disease
VZV antibody testing must be conducted to mitigate risk of
disseminated herpes zoster

Dimethyl
fumarate
Third Immunomodulator Necessary to monitor lymphocyte count as risk mitigation against PML
Gastrointestinal complications may limit use

Moderately effective

IFN-β First Immunomodulator Well characterized long-term safety and efficacy profiles
Patients should not be required to ‘fail’ treatment before receiving
alternatives

Glatiramer
acetate
First Immunomodulator Best safety profile for pregnant women with mild disease
Patients should not be required to ‘fail’ treatment before receiving
alternatives

Teriflunomide Third Pyrimidine synthesis
inhibitor
Risk of teratogenicity precludes use in women who are, or intend
to become, pregnant
*

Rankings are estimated on the basis of clinical trials, postapproval studies and few head-to-head comparisons. The factors that determine drug efficacy in any individual patient are largely undefined, and good clinical judgement is essential for treatment selection, especially in women of childbearing age. Abbreviations: JCV, polyomavirus JC; PML, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy; VZV, varicella zoster virus.