Table 1.
Efficacy ranking of approved therapies for multiple sclerosis*
Drug | Era of development |
Mechanism of action | Key considerations |
---|---|---|---|
Most effective | |||
| |||
Natalizumab | Second | Monoclonal antibody against integrin-α4 in leukocytes |
Risk of PML must be assessed via presence of JCV antibodies Substantial risk of relapse after discontinuation |
| |||
Highly effective | |||
| |||
Fingolimod | Second | Sphingosine S1P receptor modulator |
Cardiac complications preclude use in individuals aged ≥50 years, and in those with history of cardiac disease VZV antibody testing must be conducted to mitigate risk of disseminated herpes zoster |
| |||
Dimethyl fumarate |
Third | Immunomodulator | Necessary to monitor lymphocyte count as risk mitigation against PML Gastrointestinal complications may limit use |
| |||
Moderately effective | |||
| |||
IFN-β | First | Immunomodulator | Well characterized long-term safety and efficacy profiles Patients should not be required to ‘fail’ treatment before receiving alternatives |
| |||
Glatiramer acetate |
First | Immunomodulator | Best safety profile for pregnant women with mild disease Patients should not be required to ‘fail’ treatment before receiving alternatives |
| |||
Teriflunomide | Third | Pyrimidine synthesis inhibitor |
Risk of teratogenicity precludes use in women who are, or intend to become, pregnant |
Rankings are estimated on the basis of clinical trials, postapproval studies and few head-to-head comparisons. The factors that determine drug efficacy in any individual patient are largely undefined, and good clinical judgement is essential for treatment selection, especially in women of childbearing age. Abbreviations: JCV, polyomavirus JC; PML, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy; VZV, varicella zoster virus.