Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci Methods. 2015 Mar 19;252:27–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.03.016

Table 1.

Maternal baseline sociodemographic characteristics, pregnancy planning and partner

Variable Mbekweni n (%) TC Newman n (%) Total n (%) P-valuea
Number of mothers 317 (50) 317 (50) 634 (100)
Median age at enrollment (IQR) 6.7 (22.0-31.7) 24.7 (21.4-29.0) 25.6 (21.8-30.6) <0.001
Race
        Black/African 317 (100) 7 (2) 324 (51)
        White 0 (0) 3 (1) 3 (0.5)
        Mixed race 0 (0) 305 (96) 305 (48)
        Other 0 (0) 2 (0.6) 2 (0.3)
Married/Cohabitating 113 (36) 133 (42) 246 (39) 0.103
Educational attainment
    Primary 34 (11) 22 (7) 56 (9) 0.111
        Some secondary 168 (53) 158 (50) 326 (51)
        Completed secondary 97 (31) 122 (38) 219 (35)
        Any tertiary 18 (6) 15 (5) 33 (5)
Currently employed 61 (19) 97 (31) 158 (25) 0.001
Primigravida 103 (32) 126 (40) 229 (36) 0.057
Unplanned pregnancy 219 (69) 196 (62) 415 (65)0.055 0.055
Partner support
        Not at all/slightly supportive 31 (10) 30 (9) 61 (10) <0.001
        Moderately supportive 52 (16) 13 (4) 65 (10)
        Extremely supportive 234 (74) 274 (86) 508 (80)
Reliance on partner for help
        Not at all/not very often 39 (12) 31 (10) 70 (11) <0.001
        Some of the time 102 (32) 17 (5) 119 (19)
        Most of the time/all of the time 176 (56) 269 (85) 445 (70)
a

Variables compared across site using χ2 tests for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank sum tests (Mann-Whitney tests) for continuous variables