Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 2;15:109. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0340-0

Table 2.

Relationship between stromal FAP expression and clinicopathological factors

Characteristics FAP negative/weak FAP moderate/strong P value
Age 0.911
  ≥65 16 26
  <65 3 3
T categorya 0.479
  T1/T2 5 4
  T3/T4 14 25
N categorya 0.444
  N0 10 12
  N1 9 17
M categorya 0.317
  M0 17 22
  M1 2 7
UICCb stage 0.406
  I/II 11 13
  III/IV 8 16
Histological differentiation <0.05
  Well 6 2
  Moderate/Poor 13 27

aTNM classification of the UICC, bUICC, Union for International Cancer Control