Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 1;10(9):e0137208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137208

Table 2. Factors, factor loadings, and communalities for 18 social vulnerability attributes across Liberian districts as derived from exploratory factor analysis.

Census Variable (Dimension of Poverty) Factors Communality
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
% households without improved drinking water [E,H] 0.891 0.232 -0.205 -0.124 -0.114 0.922
% households that have unimproved waste disposal [H] 0.855 0.133 0.775
% households that are >80 minutes to a rural medical facility [H] 0.702 0.164 0.535
% households that are >20 minutes to drinking water [E] 0.589 0.152 -0.112 -0.181 -0.185 0.455
% population that is illiterate [H] 0.575 0.417 0.173 0.266 0.613
% households that do not produce livestock [E,H] 0.858 0.153 0.198 -0.193 0.844
% households that do not produce poultry [E,H] 0.766 0.603
% households that do not produce fish [E,H] 0.729 0.247 0.101 0.608
% undernourished [H] -0.107 0.802 0.145 -0.166 0.712
% stunted children [H] -0.545 -0.164 -0.154 0.354
% population that is displaced [PR] -0.129 -0.122 0.760 0.621
% households without a mattress [E] 0.324 0.630 0.252 0.595 0.934
% population that is disabled [H, PR] -0.220 0.354 0.894 0.130 0.995
% population that is dependent [PR] -0.214 0.302 -0.107 0.491 -0.177 0.233 0.476
% households lacking access to free medical care, drugs, or both [H] 0.383 -0.116 0.782 0.789
% households without access to land [E] 0.135 0.101 0.618 0.426
% households without furniture [E] 0.159 0.427 -0.164 0.101 0.183 0.540 0.580
% households with substandard housing [E] -0.124 0.255 -0.312 0.147 0.171 0.206 0.277
SS loadings 2.835 2.229 1.601 1.433 1.274 1.189 0.958
Proportion of variance explained 0.157 0.124 0.089 0.080 0.071 0.066 0.053
Cumulative variance explained 0.157 0.281 0.370 0.450 0.521 0.587 0.640

Letters in () indicate the key dimension(s) of poverty reflected by the census variable. E = economic, H = human, PR = protective (the others are political and sociocultural). Entries in bold indicate loadings > 0.444. Goodness of fit of the model testing the null hypothesis of no difference between observed data and an hypothesized seven factor solution, χ2 = 56.57, df = 48; p-value 0.186.