Table 4.

Group Differences in Brain Response to Positively and Negatively Valenced Faces and Inhibitory Control in Emotional vs. Non-emotional Contexts

Peak Anatomic Location	Regions Included	# Voxels^a	x	y	z	t statistic^b	Cohen’s d^c

FH+Pain vs. FH−Pain

Go

*Happy > Calm*

None

*Happy < Calm*

1. Left Fusiform Gyrus	Cerebellum, PHG, MTG	162	−50	−47	−13	−2.76	1.48
2. Right Fusiform Gyrus	LG, MOG, IOG, Declive	97	38	−65	−10	−2.73	1.46
3. Right IPL	SMG	47	65	−35	30	−3.12	1.67
4. Right Cuneus	MOG, SOG, MTG	46	32	−86	27	−2.78	1.49
5. Left Uncus	Amyg, STG, PHG	44	−23	2	−25	−2.75	1.47
6. Right Culmen	PHG, Fusiform Gyrus	43	32	−35	−19	−2.79	1.49
7. Right IFG	STG, PHG	39	26	14	−16	−2.83	1.51
8. Right Thalamus	PHG, MB, STN	39	2	−11	−7	−2.91	1.56
9. Left Precuneus		30	−17	−74	48	−2.60	1.39
10. Right PHG	Thalamus, SN, STN, MB	27	14	−23	−13	−2.78	1.49

Go

*Scared > Calm*

None

*Scared < Calm*

1. Left SFG	MFG	41	−17	71	6	−2.83	1.51
2. Left PCC	PHG, LG, Culmen	35	−5	−50	6	−3.09	1.65
3. Right Precuneus		35	26	−68	33	−2.81	1.50
4. Right Declive		34	2	−80	−22	−2.61	1.40
5. Right SFG	MFG, MeFG	33	20	8	54	−2.85	1.52

*Calm NoGo*

*Happy > Calm*

None

*Happy < Calm*

1. Right Postcentral	IPL, Cingulate
Gyrus	Gyrus, Precentral Gyrus	150	35	−35	63	−2.58	1.38
2. Right IFG	Insula, STG	80	47	14	−1	−2.50	1.34

*Calm NoGo*

*Scared > Calm*

1. Right MTG	PCC, Cuneus, Precuneus	26	−29	−68	30	3.01	1.61
2. Right Cingulate Gyrus	PCC	25	5	−29	27	2.62	1.40

*Scared < Calm*

None

PHG = parahippocampal gyrus, MTG = middle temporal gyrus, LG = lingual gyrus, MOG = middle occipital gyrus, IOG = inferior occipital gyrus, SMG = supramarginal gyrus, SOG = superior occipital gyrus, STG = superior temporal gyrus, MB = mammillary body, STN = subthalamic nucleus, SN = substantia nigra, MFG = middle frontal gyrus, MeFG = medial frontal gyrus, IPL = inferior parietal lobule, PCC = posterior cingulate cortex, IFG = inferior frontal gyrus, SFG = superior frontal gyrus

Voxel sizes were determined by examining voxel count reports of the voxel/cluster thresholded maps using Analysis of Functional NeuroImage’s (AFNI’s) Graphic User Interface cluster report tool.

t values of the clusters were determined by extracting t-values using AFNI’s 3dROIstats tool from the corresponding t statistical sub-brick of the resulting voxel/cluster thresholded maps.

Cohen’s d for independent samples t-tests was calculated using the following formula: Cohen’s d = 2t/√df (Rosenthal & Rosnow, 1991). All of the effect sizes reported are considered large (Cohen’s d > 0.8).