Table 2.
Sham ERN |
tDCS-induced Δ ERN |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
R | p | R | p | |
Illness duration | 0.093 | 0.714 | 0.256 | 0.304 |
SAPS | −0.031 | 0.902 | 0.035 | 0.892 |
Hallucinations | −0.296 | 0.233 | −0.175 | 0.488 |
Bizarre behavior | −0.018 | 0.944 | −0.274 | 0.271 |
Delusions | 0.157 | 0.535 | −0.804 | 0.00005* |
Positive formal TD | −0.043 | 0.864 | 0.078 | 0.757 |
SANS | −0.740 | 0.0004* | −0.174 | 0.490 |
Affective flattening | −0.657 | 0.003* | −0.150 | 0.552 |
Alogia | −0.424 | 0.080 | 0.074 | 0.770 |
Avolition apathy | −0.137 | 0.589 | −0.128 | 0.612 |
Anhedonia asociality | −0.495 | 0.037* | −0.330 | 0.182 |
Attention | −0.277 | 0.265 | 0.077 | 0.762 |
BPRS | −0.288 | 0.246 | −0.214 | 0.393 |
aThe two-tailed Pearson correlation results show the brain-symptom relationships between individual patient ERN learning rates, and clinical symptom scores and illness duration. Learning rate parameters were taken from logarithmic model fits based on ERN amplitude dynamics during learning in the sham, baseline condition (left columns), and the change in ERN amplitude dynamics during learning from sham to anodal conditions (right columns). TD, thought disorder.
*Significant.