Table 2.
Participants’ characteristic | Regression coefficient | p-value | OR [95 % CI] |
---|---|---|---|
Marital status | |||
Married | Reference | Reference | Reference |
Cohabiting | 0.27 | 0.52 | 1.31 [0.57, 3.02] |
Single | −0.58 | 0.59 | 0.56 [0.07, 4.72] |
Family support | |||
Very much supported | Reference | Reference | Reference |
Fairly supported | 0.43 | 0.3 | 1.54 [0.68, 3.47] |
Not supported at all | 0.34 | 0.43 | 1.41 [0.60, 3.28] |
Pregnancy decision | |||
Always involved | Reference | Reference | Reference |
Involved sometimes | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.82 [0.73, 4.52] |
Never involved | 1.38 | 0.06 | 3.97 [0.96, 16.45] |
Pregnancy-related anxiety | 0.31 | <0.001 | 1.36 [1.23, 1.50] |
Relationship with partner | |||
Very good | Reference | Reference | NA |
Fairly good | 0.51 | 0.37 | NA |
Poor | 2.6 | 0.01 | NA |
SES | |||
High wealth tertile | Reference | Reference | NA |
Low to moderate wealth tertiles | −0.55 | 0.25 | NA |
Relationship with partner x SES interaction | |||
Very good relationship x high SES | NA | NA | Reference |
Very good relationship x low to moderate SES | NA | NA | 0.58 [0.23,1.47] |
Fairly good relationship x high SES | NA | NA | 1.66 [0.55, 5.02] |
Fairly good relationship x low to moderate SES | 1.37 | 0.03 | 3.77 [1.30, 10.98] |
Poor relationship x high SES | NA | NA | 13.48 [1.71, 106.31]a |
Poor relationship x low to moderate SES | 2.36 | 0.17 | 82.34 [4.47, 1516.60]a |
OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, NA not applicable, SES socio-economic status
aThese CI are too wide given low frequencies by outcome in these categories