Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 23;6:7498. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8498

Figure 4. Numerical results of the information-thermodynamics bound on the robustness.

Figure 4

We compare the robustness Inline graphic (red line), the information-thermodynamic bound Inline graphic (green line) and the conventional thermodynamic bound Inline graphic (blue line). The initial condition is the stationary state with Inline graphic, fixed ligand signal βlt = 0, and noise intensity Ta = 0.005. We numerically confirmed that Inline graphic holds for the six transition processes. These results imply that, for the signal transduction model, the information-thermodynamic bound is tighter than the conventional thermodynamic bound. The parameters are chosen as τa = 0.02, τm = 0.2, α = 2.7 and Inline graphic to be consistent with the real parameters of E. coli bacterial chemotaxis 7,14,16. We discuss the six different types of input signals βlt (red solid line) and noises Inline graphic (green dashed line). (a) Step function: βlt = 0.01 and Inline graphic for t > 0. (b) Sinusoidal function: βlt = 0.01 sin(400t) and Inline graphic for t > 0. (c) Linear function: βlt = 10t and Inline graphic for t > 0. (d) Exponential decay: βLt = 0.01[1−exp(−200t)] and Inline graphic for t > 0. (e) Square wave: Inline graphic and Inline graphic for t > 0, where Inline graphic denotes the floor function. (f) Triangle wave: Inline graphic and Inline graphic for t > 0.