Table 1.

Motor evaluations in the proposed driving assessment models.

Study	Population	Motor assessment	Outcome
Ball et al., 2006	Older adults	Rapid Walk Foot tap Arm reach Head/neck rotation	Physical performance was not a significant predictor of prospective crash
Eby et al., 2007	Older adults	Rapid pace walk Arm reach Head/neck rotation Hand strength	Driving assessment battery development
Stav et al., 2008	Older drivers	Head/neck flexibility Rapid pace walk Range of motion  Cervical  Trunk  Upper extremities  Lower extremities Manual muscle test  Upper/lower extremities	Rapid pace walk was the only motor test included in the suggested driving assessment model
Wood et al., 2008	Older drivers	Neck range of motion Quadriceps strength Postural sway	Knee extensor, strength and postural sway were the best driving performance predictors under the motor domain
Antin et al., 2012	Drivers vs.non-drivers	Strength/torque  Upper/lower body Head-neck-torso flexibility	Physical dimension was part of a developed model
Marshall et al., 2013	Older drivers	Range of motion Manual test of motor strength Timed up and go Rapid pace walk One-leg stance	Driving assessment battery development
Ott et al., 2013	Normal cognition vs.Cognitive impairment	Rapid pace walk Strength Range of motion  Neck  Limbs	Rapid pace walk and range of motion were included as part of a set of tests able to predict driving performance
Woolnough et al., 2013		Rapid Pace Walk Manual Range of Motion  Neck  Shoulder flexion  Elbow flexion  Finger curl  Ankleplantar  flexion/dorsiflexion Manual test of strength  Shoulder  Adduction/abduction  Wrist  flexion/extension  Ankle  dorsiflexion/plantar  Flexion	No association with crash involvement
Lacherez et al., 2014	Older drivers	Muscle strength  Quadriceps  Ankle dorsiflexion  Hand grip  Range of motion  Neck	Quadriceps strength was part of a three variable model to discriminate safe from unsafe drivers