Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Leuk Res. 2015 Feb 7;39(5):495–500. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2015.02.001

Table 2. Investigator-Reported Best Overall Responseto Alvocidib in the ITT Population.

Hybrid Criteriaa NCI-96 Criteriab
Number Percent Number Percent
Overall Response Rate 41 25 50 30
 Complete Response 3 2 6 4
 Nodular Partial Response (nPR) 2 1 2 1
 Partial Response 36 22 42 26
 Stable Disease 53 32 66 40
 Disease Progression 21 13 26 16
 Not assessed 50a 30 23b 14
del(17p) (n = 49) 7 14 13 27
del(11q) (n = 43)c 11 26 12 28
Bulky lymphadenopathy (n = 115) 29 25 33 29
“Double refractory”d (n = 48) 5 10 7 15
TLS (n = 39) 12 31 15 38
a

Of the 50 patients not assessed for best response, 6 were never treated with alvocidib and 28 receivedonly one treatment cycle. The remaining 16 patients received between 2 and 6 cycles of treatment, but the investigator failed to report a best response by hybrid criteria. No missing data imputation was performed.

b

Of the 23 patients who were not assessed for best response, 6 were never treated with alvocidib and 14 had only one treatment cycle. The remaining 3 patients received 2 or 3 cycles of treatment, but the investigator failed to report a best response by NCI 96 criteria. No missing data imputation was performed.

c

Classified according to Döhner, et al31.

d

Refractory to both fludarabine and alemtuzumab