Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 2.
Published in final edited form as: Med Care. 2013 Jul;51(7):589–596. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31829019a4

Table 2.

Comparison of “CMS all-cause” vs. “CMS modified-for-preventability” hospital profiles for payment adjustment under CMS pay-for-performance

CMS modified-for-preventability model
Better in all condition cohorts Worse in 1 condition Worse in 2 conditions Worse in 3 conditions Total
CMS all-cause model Better in all conditions 29 5 0 0 34
Worse in 1 condition 5 24 8 1 38
Worse in 2 conditions 1 9 28 4 42
Worse in 3 conditions 0 1 5 11 17
Total 35 39 41 16 131

NOTES:

CMS= Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

The three condition cohorts for readmissions are acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia.

We combined information on predicted-to-expected readmission ratios across the 3 conditions. Not every condition included CMS readmission rates for all 131 hospitals (if volume was under 25, the hospital was not included in the analysis). If a hospital did not have a CMS-generated readmission rate, we considered the hospital profile to be “average.”