Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 2.
Published in final edited form as: Kidney Int. 2010 Oct 27;79(4):471–477. doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.431

Table 4.

Effect of prescribed dietary protein on bias in GFR estimation using the MDRD study equation and the CKD-EPI Cystatin C 2008 study equation.*

Equation Performance Timing Study A (n=302) Study B (n=124)
Δ Bias eGFRcr (ml/min/1.73 m2) Baseline −0.23 [−1.61, 1.15] −0.35 [−1.75, 1.10]
Δ Bias eGFRcr (ml/min/1.73 m2) Follow up −2.77 [−4.08, −1.48] −1.37 [−2.88, 0.15]
Δ Bias eGFRcys (ml/min/1.73 m2) Baseline −0.60 [−2.20, 0.99] −0.50 [−0.75, 1.76]
Δ Bias eGFRcys (ml/min/1.73 m2) Follow up −0.31 [−1.75, 1.13] −0.02 [−1.70, 1.75]
*

Differences in mean bias between randomized groups (bias in low protein diet group minus bias in usual protein diet group in Study A; very low minus low protein diet group in Study B). Bias is defined as measured-estimated GFR.

All values are reported as mean and 95 % CI. Values highlighted in boldface are statistically significant with p<0.01. p for eGFRcr at follow up in Study B is 0.08.