Table 7.
Changes in other clinical outcomes
Author | On schedule | To visit | With information | LDL (mg/dL) | SBP (mm/Hg) | Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | Triglycerides (mg/dL) | Other | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Int | Con | p | Int | Con | p | Int | Con | p | Int | Con | p | ||||||
39 | Kirsh et al. 2007 [12] | ✓ | −16 | −5.4 | 0.29 | −14.8 | −2.5 | 0.04 | |||||||||
70 | Subramanian et al. 2009 [23] | ✓ | −6 | −4 | NS | 1 | −2 | ≤0.05 | |||||||||
5 | Benhamou et al. 2007 [63] | ✓ | Glycaemia | ||||||||||||||
6 | Bond et al. 2006 [64] | ✓ | BS | ||||||||||||||
7 | Bond et al. 2007 [36] | ✓ | −6.8 | −1 | ≤.010 | −11.4 | −5.1 | ≤.050 | HDL | ||||||||
Wt | |||||||||||||||||
DBP | |||||||||||||||||
8 | Carter et al. 2011 [37] | ✓ | −7 | −8 | NS | BMI | |||||||||||
Wt | |||||||||||||||||
DBP | |||||||||||||||||
12 | Cho et al. 2009 [66] (phone) | ✓ | NP | NA | NS | NP | NA | NS | NP | NA | NS | FPG | |||||
2HPMG | |||||||||||||||||
HDL | |||||||||||||||||
Cho et al. 2009 [66] (internet) | ✓ | NP | NA | NS | NP | NA | NS | NP | NA | NS | FPG | ||||||
2HPMG | |||||||||||||||||
HDL | |||||||||||||||||
13 | Cho et al. 2011 [67] | ✓ | −0.2c | NA | .043 | −0.5c | NA | NS | FBG | ||||||||
HDL | |||||||||||||||||
NA | 0.1c | NS | NA | −0.3c | NS | ||||||||||||
Liver enzymes | |||||||||||||||||
18 | Dijkstra et al. 2005 [54] | ✓ | 1.1 | −0.2 | NS | -0.2c | −0.2c | NS | DBP | ||||||||
CR | |||||||||||||||||
24 | Glasgow et al. 2003 [70] (overall) | ✓ | −8.3 | NA | ≤.010 | −11.7 | NA | ≤.010 | −16.5 | NA | ≤.001 | Lipid ratio | |||||
HDL | |||||||||||||||||
Glasgow et al. 2003 [70] (peer support) | ✓ | Lipid ratio | |||||||||||||||
Glasgow et al. 2003 [70] (tailored self-management) | ✓ | Lipid ratio | |||||||||||||||
26 | Grant et al. 2008 [55] | ✓ | NP | NP | NS | Blood pressure | |||||||||||
27 | Harno et al. 2006 [71] | ✓ | −0.18c | 0.11c | NP | 1 | 1 | NP | −0.21c | 0.12c | NP | −0.05c | 0.21c | NP | DBP | ||
FBG | |||||||||||||||||
BMI | |||||||||||||||||
HDL | |||||||||||||||||
CR | |||||||||||||||||
32 | HS Kim et al. 2005 [44] “Effects of an Internet-based Intervention…” | ✓ | −13.50 | NA | NS | 27.30 | NA | NS | FPG | ||||||||
2HPMG | |||||||||||||||||
HDL | |||||||||||||||||
34 | HS Kim 2007 [39] “A randomized controlled trial of a nurse short-message service…” | ✓ | 2HPMG | ||||||||||||||
FPG | |||||||||||||||||
35 | HS Kim 2007 [40] “Impact of web-based nurse’s education…” | ✓ | FPG d | ||||||||||||||
2HPMG | |||||||||||||||||
36 | HS Kim and H. Jeong 2007 [41] “A nurse short message service by cellular phone…” | ✓ | 2HPMG | ||||||||||||||
FPG | |||||||||||||||||
37 | HS Kim and M. Song 2008 [43] “Technological intervention for obese patients with type 2 diabetes” | ✓ | −5.1 | 9.9 | 0.04 | 4.5 | 40.8 | 0.62 | FPG | ||||||||
2HPMG | |||||||||||||||||
HDL | |||||||||||||||||
38 | SI Kim and HS Kim 2008 [73] “Effectiveness of mobile and internet intervention…” | ✓ | 2HPMG | ||||||||||||||
FPG | |||||||||||||||||
39 | Kwon et al. 2004a [74] | ✓ | −0.9 | NA | NS | −24.4 | NA | ≤.007 | HDL | ||||||||
FPG | |||||||||||||||||
40 | Kwon et al. 2004b [45] | ✓ | −1.93 | NA | NS | −3.33 | NA | NS | −19.5 | NA | NS | HDL | |||||
NA | 1.88 | NS | NA | 7.3 | NS | NA | 13.5 | NS | FBG | ||||||||
49 | McMahon et al. 2005 [78] | ✓ | −6 | −5 | NS | −10 | −7 | ≤0.01 | −38 | NA | ≤0.01 | DBP | |||||
NA | −2 | NS | HDL | ||||||||||||||
50 | McMahon et al. 2012 [47] (online care) | ✓ | −4.0 | NA | 0.29 | −0.3 | NA | 0.89 | −7.8 | NA | 0.07 | −25.5 | NA | 0.01 | DBP | ||
HDL | |||||||||||||||||
Wt | |||||||||||||||||
BMI | |||||||||||||||||
McMahon et al. 2012 [47] (telephone care) | ✓ | −5.5 | NA | 0.12 | −6.7 | NA | .006 | −8.5 | NA | 0.05 | −6.5 | NA | 0.68 | DBP | |||
HDL | |||||||||||||||||
Wt | |||||||||||||||||
BMI | |||||||||||||||||
McMahon et al. 2012 [47] (usual care with web training) | ✓ | 5.8 | NA | 0.12 | −3.1 | NA | 0.30 | −10.7 | NA | 0.02 | −26.4 | NA | 0.08 | DBP | |||
HDL | |||||||||||||||||
Wt | |||||||||||||||||
BMI | |||||||||||||||||
52 | Meigs et al. 2003 [49] | ✓ | −14.7 | −9.4 | 0.30 | 0.8 | −2.2 | 0.03 | DBP | ||||||||
55 | Moattari et al. 2013 [80] | ✓ | −8.2 | 5.1 | <0.02 | 3.9 | −0.8 | 0.69 | 45.3 | −7.9 | 0.34 | HDL | |||||
FBS | |||||||||||||||||
61 | Ralston et al. 2009 [38] | ✓ | NP | NP | NS | NP | NP | NS | DBP | ||||||||
62 | Ryan et al. 2013 [85] | ✓ | −15.7 | NA | 0.10 | 4.4 | NA | 0.30 | −15.5 | NA | 0.14 | 21 | NA | 0.01 | DBP | ||
HDL | |||||||||||||||||
BMI | |||||||||||||||||
67 | KE Smith et al. 2004 [86] | ✓ | −18 | NA | NS | −6 | NA | NS | −25 | NA | NS | −9 | NA | NS | BMI | ||
DBP | |||||||||||||||||
HDL | |||||||||||||||||
68 | Song et al. 2009 [87] | ✓ | FBG | ||||||||||||||
71 | Tang et al. 2013 [89] | ✓ | −6.1 | 0.0 | .001 | −7.1 | −5.3 | NS | Wt | ||||||||
DBP | |||||||||||||||||
Framingham cardiovascular risk | |||||||||||||||||
73 | Tildesley et al. 2010 [90] | ✓ | NP | NP | S | NP | NP | S | |||||||||
76 | Yoo et al. 2009 [91] “A ubiquitous chronic disease care system using cellular phones and the internet” | ✓ | −0.4c | −0.1c | 0.03 | −0.5c | 0.0c | 0.01 | Wt | ||||||||
BMI | |||||||||||||||||
−0.4c | NA | ≤.001 | −7 | NA | ≤.001 | −0.5c | NA | ≤.001 | −0.22c | NA | ≤.003 | ||||||
DBP | |||||||||||||||||
HDL | |||||||||||||||||
NA | −0.1c | NS | NA | −4.00 | NS | NA | 0.0c | NS | NA | 0.08c | NS | ||||||
77 | Yoon and HS Kim 2008 [92] | ✓ | −3.1a | 29.3a | 0.18 | −31.1a | 52.3a | 0.28 | 2HPMG | ||||||||
HDL | |||||||||||||||||
FPG | |||||||||||||||||
4 | Bailie et al. 2004 [62] | ✓ | ✓ | 66e | NA | NS | DBP | ||||||||||
0a | NA | NS | |||||||||||||||
11 | Cho et al. 2006 [57] | ✓ | ✓ | −0.14ac | −0.31ac | NS | −0.08ac | 0.4ac | ≤.050 | HDL | |||||||
FBG | |||||||||||||||||
CR | |||||||||||||||||
16 | de Grauw et al. 2002 [19] | ✓ | ✓ | −3 | NA | 0.20 | −31 | NA | ≤.001 | −41 | NA | ≤.001 | HDL | ||||
FBG | |||||||||||||||||
DBP | |||||||||||||||||
30 | Jones and Curry 2006 [50] | ✓ | ✓ | −2.5 | −5.3 | NS | −1.1 | −0.7 | NS | DBP | |||||||
−2.5 | NA | NS | −1.1 | NA | NS | ||||||||||||
Wt | |||||||||||||||||
NA | −5.3 | 0.03 | NA | −0.7 | NS | ||||||||||||
45 | MacLean et al. 2009 [20] | ✓ | ✓ | −12.5 | −13.6 | NS | BMI | ||||||||||
DBP | |||||||||||||||||
28 | Holbrook et al. 2009 [28] | ✓ | ✓ | −0.05c | 0.02c | NS | −4.7 | 0.3 | 0.04 | DBP | |||||||
BMI | |||||||||||||||||
Alb | |||||||||||||||||
29 | Hurwitz et al. 1993 [72] | ✓ | ✓ | RPG | |||||||||||||
53 | Meulepas et al. 2007 [30] | ✓ | ✓ | −5 | 4 | ≤.050 | −0.4c | −0.3c | NS | −0.1c | 0.1c | NS | FBG | ||||
DBP | |||||||||||||||||
54 | Meulepas et al. 2008 [31] | ✓ | ✓ | 4 | 5 | NS | −0.3c | −0.3c | NS | −0.3c | −0.3c | NS | FBG | ||||
BMI | |||||||||||||||||
DBP | |||||||||||||||||
72 | Thomas et al. 2007 [26] | ✓ | ✓ | −4.9 | −4 | 0.61 | −0.5 | NA | NS | DBP | |||||||
NA | 1.7 | NS | |||||||||||||||
75 | Yeh et al. 2006 [33] | ✓ | ✓ | −24 | −22 | ≤.050 | FBG | ||||||||||
19 | Edelman et al. 2010 [34] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | −13.7a | −6.4a | 0.01 | DBP | |||||||||
42 | Lin et al. 2007 [29] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | −0.59c | NA | <0.01 | −4.7 | NA | NS | DBP | ||||||
Wt | |||||||||||||||||
NA | −0.16c | NS | NA | 1 | NS |
Int intervention, Con Control, NA not Applicable, NS non-significant (p-value>0.05), S significant (p-value≤0.05), NP not provided
Results are differences in mean before and after implementation of intervention except those indicated with the following superscripts
aMultiple measurements are presented over time after the intervention in the paper, but the last measurement is used to calculate the difference in this table
bMultiple measurements are presented over time after the intervention in the paper, but median change is reported
cUnit is mmol/l
dHbA1c<7 at baseline
e% with BP < 140/90
Other outcome measures include: DBP Diastolic blood pressure, CR Creatinine, Wt Weight, FPG Fasting plasma glucose, FBG Fasting blood glucose, FBS Fasting blood sugar, BS Blood sugar, 2HPMG 2-hour post-meal glucose, FBG Fasting blood glucose, RPG Random plasma glucose, Alb Albuminuria
Bolded text in ‘Other’ category indicates significant finding