Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 2.
Published in final edited form as: Connect Tissue Res. 2012 Aug 23;54(1):5–13. doi: 10.3109/03008207.2012.715700

Table 1.

Physical characteristics of Bgn KO mice compared to Bgn WT mice

Physical
Parameters (n)
WT: Male
(11)
KO: Male
(5)
WT:
Female
(12)
KO:
Female (7)
WT Vs
KO
M Vs F
Body Weight (g) 36.2 ± 2.7 30.2 ± 0.9 26.8 ±1.2 22.7 ± 0.6 p=0.022 p<0.001
Body Length (cm) 9.8 ± 0.2 9.3 ± 0.2 9.5 ± 0.2 8.7 ± 0.08 p=0.004 N. S.
Femur Length
(cm)
1.58 ± 0.02 1.52 ± 0.04 1.60 ± 0.02 1.46 ± 0.04 p=0.002 N. S.
% adiposity (100
x fat/ body
weight)
17.6 ± 2.4 10.5 ± 1.6 15.0 ± 1.2 10.4 ± 1.4 p=0.006 N. S.
% lean mass (100
x lean mass/ body
weight
64.5 ± 2.5 64.7 ± 1.6 65.1 ± 2.7 67.5 ± 1.3 N. S. N. S.
% Liver
weight/body
weight
4.9 ± 0.3 4.8 ± 0.2 4.6 ± 0.4 4.5 ± 0.2 N. S. N. S.

Data are shown as means ± SEMs for N = 5-12 per group as indicated, measured after 12 months of normal rodent chow feeding. All analyses were done by two-way ANOVA.