Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Diabetes Complications. 2015 Feb 3;29(3):372–377. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.01.011

Table 2.

Comparison Between ROC for Different Types of Neuropathy

1. Area Under the ROC for All Subjects with Neuropathy
Measurement Scale Area Lower Limit 95% CI Upper Limit 95% CI Significance
mTCNS 0.9983 0.9306 0.9939 0.0060
TNSc 0.9798 0.9439 1.0000 0.1572
NDS 0.9717 0.9451 0.9982 0.1237
ENS 0.9652 0.9356 0.9948 0.0426
NISLL 0.9623 0.9306 0.9939 0.0617
UENS 0.9483 0.9356 0.9948 0.5112
MDNS 0.9408 0.8995 0.9822 0.1237
2. Area Under the ROC for Subjects with Large Fiber Neuropathy
Measurement Scale Area Lower Limit 95% CI Upper Limit 95% CI Significance
mTCNS 0.9986 0.9952 1.0000 0.1544
TNSc 0.9865 0.9606 1.0000 0.2718
ENS 0.9574 0.8956 1.0000 0.3835
NDS 0.9567 0.8964 1.0000 0.7437
NISLL 0.9467 0.8792 1.0000 0.4206
UENS 0.9411 0.8675 1.0000 0.7880
MDNS 0.9389 0.8560 1.0000 0.6044
3. Area Under the ROC for Subjects with Small Fiber Neuropathy
Measurement Scale Area Lower Limit 95% CI Upper Limit 95% CI Significance
mTCNS 0.9959 0.9878 1.0000 0.0295
TNSc 0.9694 0.9178 1.0000 0.1324
NDS 0.9572 0.8993 1.0000 0.0367
ENS 0.9402 0.8756 1.0000 0.0730
NISLL 0.9355 0.8665 1.0000 0.1209
UENS 0.9205 0.8452 0.9958 0.2364
MDNS 0.8879 0.7910 0.9849 0.3175