Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 11;6(17):15662–15680. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3525

Table 4. Multivariate analysis of age, ER-, PR-status, lymph node, grade and 92-probe signature in relation to the patient's survival.

Parameters HR (95%CI) p Value
Analysis without 92-probe signature
Age (years) 0.996 (0.980–1.013) 0.674
ER status (+/–) 0.570 (0.269–1.204) 0.141
PR status (+/–) 1.148 (0.555–2.371) 0.710
Lymph node (+/–) 1.799 (1.161–2.788) 0.009
Grade (1, 2, 3) 1.536 (1.121–2.105) 0.008
Analysis with 92-probe signature
Age (years) 0.996 (0.979–1.014) 0.674
ER status (+/–) 1.111 (0.479–2.577) 0.806
PR status (+/–) 1.269 (0.610–2.639) 0.524
Lymph node (+/–) 1.856 (1.197–2.876) 0.006
Grade (1, 2, 3) 1.382 (1.000–1.908) 0.050
92-probe signature (low/high) 2.746 (1.443–5.227) 0.002

The multivariate model included 301 patients for DFS, owing to missing values in twenty two. A low risk was defined as a prognostic index less than or equal to −0.272144, and a high risk as a PI higher than −0.272144. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confident interval; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor.