Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015 Aug 6;39(9):1775–1787. doi: 10.1111/acer.12816

Table 4.

Post Hoc Analyses Testing Pre-Role Problem Drinking as a Moderator of Role Effects on Subsequent Problem Drinking

Standardized
regression
coefficients
Model 1: Moderation of Wave 5 role transition
effects by Wave 4 problem drinking

  Age 29 problem drinking on
    Sex 0.048
    Familial AUD 0.044
    Age 21 problem drinking 0.174**
    Age 25 problem drinking 0.470**
    Age 25 role transition −0.077
    Interaction: Age 21 problem drinking
    by age 25 role transition
0.026

  Conditional age 25 role transition effects at
  different levels of age 21 problem drinking1
    Age 21 problem drinking=0 −0.097
    Age 21 problem drinking=2.62 −0.077
    Age 21 problem drinking=5.67 −0.053

Model 2: Moderation of Wave 6 role transition
effects by Wave 5 problem drinking

  Age 34 problem drinking on
    Sex −0.027
    Familial AUD 0.032
    Age 25 problem drinking 0.284**
    Age 29 problem drinking 0.471**
    Age 29 role transition −0.042
    Interaction: Age 25 problem drinking
    by age 29 role transition
−0.207**

  Conditional age 29 role transition effects at
  different levels of age 25 problem drinking1
    Age 25 problem drinking=0 0.061
    Age 25 problem drinking=1.64 −0.042
    Age 25 problem drinking=4.10 −0.194*

Note. For role transition: 0=remained unmarried and a non-parent; 1=became married or a parent. For familial AUD: 0=FH−; 1=FH+. For sex: 0=male; 1=female.

1

In initial models, pre-role problem drinking was mean centered such that results indicated the model-estimated role transition effect at the mean of pre-role problem drinking. Models were then re-estimated after re-centering pre-role problem drinking to obtain model-estimated role transition effects at low (0) and high (mean + 1SD) levels of pre-role problem drinking.

*p < .05. **p < .01.