Table 3.
Correlations between Parallel Process Growth Model Parameters and Drinking Outcomes at 15-month follow-up
PDD | 95% CI | DDD | 95% CI | DrInC | 95% CI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIL intercept | −0.04 | −0.11, 0.02 | −0.15* | −0.20, −0.09 | −0.27* | −0.34, −0.20 |
PIL linear slope | −0.31* | −0.39, −0.23 | −0.36* | −0.43, −0.28 | −0.44* | −0.57, −0.32 |
Temptation intercept | 0.13* | 0.08, 0.17 | 0.19* | 0.13, 0.25 | 0.30* | 0.21, 0.39 |
Temptation linear slope | 0.38* | 0.20, 0.55 | 0.26* | 0.15, 0.38 | 0.31* | 0.09, 0.53 |
Temptation quadratic slope | −0.21 | −0.44, 0.02 | −0.12 | −0.29, 0.05 | −0.1* | −0.39, 0.11 |
Note.
p < 0.05; PIL = Purpose in Life; PDD = percent drinking days; DDD = drinks per drinking day; DrInC = Drinker Inventory of Consequences; CI = Confidence Interval.