Table 5.
The ROC analysis for the discrimination tasks based on the SRR calculated with the conventional method, which applies predetermined VOIs to the spatially normalized images. Better discrimination power was achieved with the inversely transformed VOIs using our new method, as shown in Table 3.
Versus nPD group | Versus healthy controls | Versus essential tremor subjects | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cutoff | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | AUC | Cutoff | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | AUC | Cutoff | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | AUC | |
PD group | 1.65 | 82.7 | 90.2 | 83.8 | 0.91 | 1.66 | 84.1 | 92.9 | 84.7 | 0.93 | 1.71 | 92.1 | 81.8 | 91.2 | 0.90 |
Group≤2 | 1.65 | 84.7 | 90.2 | 86.6 | 0.92 | 1.66 | 87.3 | 92.9 | 88.4 | 0.94 | 1.71 | 94.9 | 81.8 | 92.1 | 0.90 |
Group3–5 | 1.69 | 87.0 | 83.6 | 85.7 | 0.91 | 1.69 | 87.0 | 85.7 | 86.7 | 0.93 | 1.71 | 90.0 | 81.8 | 88.0 | 0.90 |
Group6–10 | 1.65 | 82.8 | 90.2 | 85.8 | 0.91 | 1.66 | 83.9 | 92.9 | 86.1 | 0.92 | 1.71 | 90.8 | 81.8 | 88.3 | 0.90 |
Group≥11 | 1.69 | 88.3 | 83.6 | 86.0 | 0.92 | 1.66 | 83.3 | 92.9 | 86.4 | 0.93 | 1.71 | 91.7 | 81.8 | 88.2 | 0.91 |