Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 1;15(5):1–61.

Table 20:

Sensitivity Analysis—MRgHIFU Funded at Six Centres (Replacing a Proportion of Uterine-Preserving Procedures Only)

Parameter Base Case Value Sensitivity Analysis Value Current Expenditure Expenditure With MRgHIFU Funded Budget Impact (Compared With Current Expenditure)
Base case results     $35,491,984 $32,069,660 ($3,422,325)
Peri-procedure direct/indirect costs of myomectomy $5,094        
    $6,000a $37,011,256 $32,175,866 ($4,835,390)
    $6,500 $37,849,706 $32,234,479 ($5,615,227)
    $7,400 $39,358,916 $32,339,982 ($7,018,934)
    $8,400 $41,035,816 $32,457,207 ($8,578,608)
Peri-procedure cost of MRgHIFU $3,499        
    −15% $35,491,984 $31,087,256 ($4,404,729)
    +15% $35,491,984 $33,052,064 ($2,439,921)
    +50%b $35,491,984 $35,344,340 ($147,645)
Number of MRgHIFU procedures per week 6        
    3 $35,491,984 $35,880,822 $388,838
    4 $35,491,984 $34,610,434 ($881,550)
    5 $35,491,984 $33,340,047 ($2,151,937)
    8c N/A N/A N/A
    10c N/A N/A N/A

Abbreviation: MRgHIFU, magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound.

a

Maximum costs for myomectomy as captured through OCCI (codes 1RM87CAGX, 1RM87BAGX, 1RM87DAAG, and 1RM87LAAK), details in Appendix 2, Table A8.

b

This value chosen to demonstrate the break-even point in terms of direct costs for MRgHIFU.

c

Insufficient number of uterine-preserving procedures performed to operate more than 8 procedures a week at 6 MRgHIFU centres.