Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 3.
Published in final edited form as: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2003 May 21;5034:10.1117/12.480330. doi: 10.1117/12.480330

Figure 5.

Figure 5

A comparison of the normalized histograms for the underlying volumes with the parameters returned by RWT estimating the mean and variance of the underlying gold-standard distribution. The true volumes were sampled from a truncated-normal distribution with a mean of 2ml and standard deviation of 0.5ml. The 25 volumes themselves had a sample mean of 1.8016ml and sample standard deviation 0.5607ml. Our no-gold-standard analysis predicted a mean of 1.9444ml and a standard deviation of 0.7057ml.