Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 14;5(15):3140–3150. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1541

Table 1.

Differences between relatedness coefficients estimated using TrioML in COANCESTRY and true rxy for simulated dyads in six relationship categories. Simulated genotypes of dyads were based on the Long Island and Zealandia microsatellite marker sets

Allele frequencies used True relationship Actual rxy TrioML mean estimated rxy (±95% CIs) Wilcoxon V P Coefficient of variation
Long Island Parent–offspring 0.5 0.48 (±0.02) 1059 NS 20%
Full siblings 0.5 0.48 (±0.03) 2116 NS 31%
Half siblings 0.25 0.25 (±0.04) 2412 NS 70%
First cousins/avuncular 0.125 0.21 (±0.04) 1603 *** 89%
Second cousins 0.01325 0.14 (±0.03) 1028 *** 117%
Unrelated 0 0.15 (±0.04) 1891 *** 124%
Zealandia Parent-offspring 0.5 0.47 (±0.02) 914 ** 23%
Full siblings 0.5 0.46 (±0.03) 2371 * 37%
Half siblings 0.25 0.25 (±0.04) 2490 NS 72%
First cousins/avuncular 0.125 0.16 (±0.03) 2145 NS 98%
Second cousins 0.01325 0.13 (±0.03) 1031 *** 115%
Unrelated 0 0.08 (±0.02) 2145 *** 144%
*

 = P < 0.05.

**

 = P < 0.01.

***

 = P < 0.001. NS = Not significant.