Skip to main content
. 2015 May 5;33(9):939–955. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0279-6

Table 2.

Quality assessment: percent of papersa,b

Mean number of patients in study samplec Ingredient approach used for provider costs Resource use and unit costs clearly described Year of cost data reported Main cost categories clearly separated Descriptive statistics presented Patient interviews Methods for valuing productivity loss clearly explained Sources for productivity losses assumptions justified
Papers with provider costs only (n = 28)
 HIC (n = 15) 307 73 60 80 73 20 NA NA NA
 UMIC (n = 11) 384 100 73 91 82 9 NA NA NA
 LMIC (n = 1) 1797 0 0 0 100 0 NA NA NA
 LIC (n = 1) 300 100 0 100 0 0 NA NA NA
Papers with patient costs included (n = 62)
 HIC (n = 10) 475 89 82 82 82 45 18 82 64
 UMIC (n = 18) 305 91 78 61 83 22 94 61 56
 LMIC (n = 16) 345 63 94 88 81 50 94 69 50
 LIC (n = 18) 154 73 78 78 89 33 100 56 44
All papers 324 81 76 77 80 30 83 65 52

HIC high-income countries, LIC low-income country, LMIC lower-middle income country, NA not applicable, UMIC upper-middle income countries

aThese results are shown for each study in the Electronic Supplementary Material (Online Resources 2 and 3)

bData are presented as % unless otherwise indicated

cAmong the studies with patient-level data