Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 21;14(3):355–363. doi: 10.1007/s10689-015-9788-x

Table 2.

Immediate and delayed risk reducing contralateral mastectomy (RRCM), differences between patients who had a predictive test versus diagnostic test

RRCM BREAST cancer diagnosis 1995–2000 BREAST cancer diagnosis 2001–2009 Total 1995–2009
N (%) DNA test before diagnosis DNA test after diagnosis Sub-total p DNA test before diagnosis DNA test after diagnosis Sub-total p
Immediate RRCM 9/20 (45.0 %) 10/122 (8.2 %) 19/142 (13.4 %) <0.0001 12/41 (29.3 %) 3/48 (6.2 %) 15/89 (16.9 %) 0.004 34/231 (14.7 %)
Delayed RRCMa 7/11 (63.6 %) 44/95 (46.3 %) 51/106 (48.1 %) 0.28 9/21 (42.9 %) 13/24 (54.2 %) 22/45 (48.9 %) 0.45 73/151 (48.3 %)

Only for patients with a primary unilateral breast cancer

Differences in uptake of RRCM between predictively and diagnostically tested women within and between 1995–2000 and 2001–2009 were analysed using Chi square tests

RRCM risk reducing contralateral mastectomy

aFor delayed RRCM, patients from LUMC were excluded