Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 25;30(8):1017–1031. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu105

Table 1.

Characteristics of R3M providers compared with non-R3M providers, by variables used in balancing the sample and obtaining propensity scores, Ghana 2011–2012

Variables R3M facilities
Non-R3M facilities
N % dist N % dist
Demographic distribution, by facility in which they work
Provider works in urban or rural setting ***
    Urban 171 86.8 189 72.7
    Rural 26 13.2 71 27.3
    Total 197 100.0 260 100.0
Ownership of facility in which provider works ***
    Public 173 87.8 192 73.9
    Private 24 12.2 68 26.2
    Total 197 100.0 260 100.0
Level of facility where provider works *
    Primary 74 37.6 128 49.2
    Secondary/tertiary 123 62.4 132 50.8
    Total 197 100.0 260 100.0
Demographic distribution, by provider's own characteristics
Professional experience
    Below 15 years 110 55.8 135 51.9
    15 years or more 87 44.2 125 48.1
    Total 197 100.0 260 100.0
Provider type
    Doctors (including Ob/Gyns) 59 30.0 57 21.9
    Non-doctors (including midwives) 138 70.1 203 78.1
    Total 197 100.0 260 100.0

Notes: All data are unweighted. Components may not sum to totals due to rounding. Missing values were dropped using listwise deletion. Chi-square tests were used to assess significance. All estimates for this sample are from information that was current at the time of the survey. Total N = 457.

***P < 0.001, *P < 0.05, †P < 0.1.