Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 25;30(8):1017–1031. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu105

Table 2.

Characteristics of R3M and non-R3M facilities and providers, by selected parameters, Ghana 2011–2012

Variables R3M facilities
Non-R3M facilities
N % dist N % dist
Facility variables
Was facility R3M or non-R3M in phase 1? 64 102
Did facility subsequently become R3M facility?
    Yes 78 76.5
    No 24 23.5
    Total 102 100.0
Region where facility is located ***
    Ashanti 13 20.3 23 22.5
    Brong-Ahafo 0 0.0 44 43.1
    Eastern 19 29.7 20 19.6
    Greater Accra 32 50.0 15 14.7
    Total 64 100.0 102 100.0
Provider variables
Number of providers in R3M/non-R3M facilities in phase 1 197 260
Distribution by abortion provision
Number of providers who provide safe abortions in average month ***
    No abortions performed 87 45.8 198 86.8
    At least one of either MVA/EVA or D&C or medication abortion 103 54.2 30 13.2
    Total 190 100.0 241 100.0
Number providers who provide PAC procedures in average month ***
    No abortions performed 66 34.2 161 66.8
    At least one of either MVA/EVA or D&C or medication abortion 127 65.8 80 33.2
    Total 193 100.0 241 100.0
Distribution by knowledge and training
Ever trained in abortion methods such as MVA/EVA, D&C, medication abortion ***
    Yes 165 83.8 134 51.5
    No 32 16.2 126 48.5
    Total 197 100.0 260 100.0
How well does provider know the abortion law? ***
    Answered six or more questions about law correctly 157 79.7 160 61.5
    Answered less than six questions about law correctly 40 20.3 100 38.5
    Total 197 100.0 260 100.0
Distribution by values, attitudes and perception
Provider attitude towards abortion provision
    More favourable 154 79.0 185 71.4
    Less favourable 41 21.0 74 28.6
    Total 195 100.0 259 100.0
Confidence in ability to provide abortion ***
    Provider has confidence in own ability to provide abortion 151 77.4 93 35.8
    Provider has no confidence in own ability to provide abortion 44 22.6 167 64.2
    Total 195 100.0 260 100.0
Provider's perception of facility support ***
    Facility is supportive of abortion provision 159 81.1 95 36.7
    Facility is not supportive of abortion provision 37 18.9 164 63.3
    Total 196 100.0 259 100.0
Demographic distribution, by facility in which they work
Size of the facility where provider works (measured by number of beds) ***
    0–8 beds 33 16.8 70 27.2
    9–50 beds 70 35.5 108 42.0
    51 + beds 94 47.7 79 30.7
    Total 197 100.0 257 100.0
Demographic distribution, by provider's own characteristics
Age of provider
    Below 40 42 21.4 71 27.3
    40 and above 154 78.6 189 72.7
    Total 196 100.0 260 100.0
Religion of provider
    Catholic 39 19.8 63 24.2
    All other religions and sects 158 80.2 197 75.8
    Total 197 100.0 260 100.0

Notes: All data are unweighted. Components may not sum to totals due to rounding. Missing values were dropped using listwise deletion. ***P < 0.001, †P < 0.1. Chi-square tests were used to assess significance. Not applicable. All estimates for this sample are from information that was current at the time of the survey. Total N = 457.