Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 3;10(9):e0137549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137549

Table 1. Comparison between Novoalign and BWA mapping algorithms.

Numbers of SNPs by allele frequency (AF)
Mapper Minimum variant reads SNP type 0.05–0.1 0.1–0.2 0.2–0.3 0.3–0.4 0.4–0.5 0.5–0.6 0.6–0.7 0.7–0.8 0.8–0.9 0.9–1.0 SNPs (total) SNPs (AF>0.1)
Novoalign 3 EMS 1357 545 199 123 68 42 35 28 24 248 2669 1312
NON-EMS 1360 658 124 38 7 2 2 1 1 6 2199 839
BWA 3 EMS 1105 429 150 99 61 48 31 25 24 251 2223 1118
NON-EMS 1039 469 92 28 9 3 3 1 1 6 1651 612
Novoalign 4 EMS 477 289 137 93 68 42 35 28 24 248 1441 964
NON-EMS 551 327 64 20 7 2 2 1 1 6 981 430
BWA 4 EMS 370 212 112 87 61 48 31 25 24 251 1221 851
NON-EMS 439 238 40 20 9 3 3 1 1 6 760 321
Novoalign 5 EMS 214 155 110 76 63 42 35 28 24 248 995 781
NON-EMS 233 144 39 12 4 2 2 1 1 6 444 211
BWA 5 EMS 175 115 93 78 56 48 31 25 24 251 896 721
NON-EMS 241 122 25 11 3 3 3 1 1 6 416 175
Novoalign 6 EMS 118 94 94 67 61 41 33 28 24 248 808 690
NON-EMS 136 80 24 9 4 2 2 1 1 6 265 129
BWA 6 EMS 88 63 83 71 54 46 31 25 24 251 736 648
NON-EMS 122 58 21 8 3 2 3 1 1 6 225 103
Novoalign 7 EMS 72 58 83 64 60 39 33 23 24 248 704 632
NON-EMS 79 47 15 5 4 2 2 1 1 6 162 83
BWA 7 EMS 52 40 77 63 53 46 30 24 24 251 660 608
NON-EMS 81 32 16 6 3 2 3 1 1 6 151 70
Novoalign 8 EMS 53 38 71 61 55 34 31 22 23 231 619 566
NON-EMS 52 33 10 4 3 1 1 0 1 6 111 59
BWA 8 EMS 33 28 67 58 47 42 27 23 24 238 587 554
NON-EMS 53 26 10 2 3 2 1 1 1 6 105 52

The Novoalign and BWA-MEM mapping algorithms were tested using the IWGSC wheat Chromosome Arm Survey Sequence reference showing total numbers of SNPs detected at different minimum variant read numbers and allele frequencies. EMS mutations are defined at G>A and C>T transitions.