Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 3;10(9):1542–1552. doi: 10.2215/CJN.09110914

Table 3.

Subgroup analysis of the effect of sodium intake reduction on urinary albumin excretion

Variables (No. of Cohorts) Pooled Mean (%) Reduction 95% Confidence Interval P Value for Interaction
RAAS-blocking therapya
 Yes (11) −41.9 −56.4 to −27.4 0.01
 No (11) −17.2 −26.1 to −2.1
Length of intervention, wk
 >1 (19) −37.1 −49.3 to −24.9 <0.01
 =1 (4) 0.3 −20.2 to 20.8
Country of origin
 Europe (16) −31.4 −44.5 to −18.2 0.70
 Australia (7) −37.1 −70.3 to −3.9
Kidney damage
 Yes (16) −37.3 −49.7 to −24.9 <0.01
 No (7) 0.27 −20.0 to 20.6
RCT double blind with placebo
 Yes (10) −22.2 −39.1 to −5.2 0.30
 No (13) −33.1 −46.7 to −19.5
Hypertension status
 Yes (14) −41.9 −54.4 to −29.4 0.20
 No (9) −26.9 −43.8 to −10.0
Diabetes statusa
 Yes (11) −39.5 −57.1 to −21.9 0.40
 No (11) −29.1 −44.8 to −13.3
Risk of bias
 Low (14) −48.8 −58.2 to −39.5 <0.01
 High (9) −18.6 −24.7 to −12.5
Industry funding source
 Yes (11) −34.5 −50.8 to −18.3 0.60
 No (12) −28.0 −48.2 to −7.9
Dietary protocol
 Slow sodium (12) −22.1 −39.0 to −5.3 0.30
 Sodium restriction (11) −33.2 −47.0 to −19.4

RAAS, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system; RCT, randomized, controlled trial.

a

Analysis did not include the study by McMahon et al. (30), because there was a mixed antihypertensive therapy and both diabetic and nondiabetic participants were included.