. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 4.

Published in final edited form as: J Clin Psychol. 2015 Mar 16;71(6):491–499. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22165

Table 1.

Hierarchical Multiple Regression Predicting Change on the HAMD From Baseline Compensatory Skills

Variable	F (df₁,df₂)	p	Partial eta
Model 1
Treatment	6.44(1,77)	.013	.28
Study	2.13(4,77)	.086	.31
HAMD at baseline	12.46(1,77)	.001	.37
Marital status	.59(1,77)	.446	−.09
Age	6.44(1,77)	.013	.28
Education	1.55(1,77)	.218	−.14
Biological sex	.51(1,77)	.477	−.08
WOR at baseline	1.41(1,77)	.239	.13
Model 2
Treatment*WOR	4.59(1,76)	.035	−.24

Note. HAMD = Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; df = degree of freedom; WOR = Ways of Responding Questionnaire.