Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2015 Sep 4;10(9):e0137338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137338

Seasonal Prevalence of Enteropathogenic Vibrio and Their Phages in the Riverine Estuarine Ecosystem of South Bengal

Subham Mookerjee 1, Prasenjit Batabyal 1, Madhumanti Halder Sarkar 1, Anup Palit 1,*
Editor: Dongsheng Zhou2
PMCID: PMC4560433  PMID: 26340543

Abstract

Diarrheal disease remains an unsolved problem in developing countries. The emergence of new etiological agents (non-cholera vibrios) is a major cause of concern for health planners. We attempted to unveil the seasonal dynamics of entero-pathogenic Vibrios in Gangetic riverine-estuarine ecosystem. 120 surface water samples were collected for a period of one year from 3 sampling sites on the Hooghly river. Five enteropathogenic Vibrio species, V. cholerae (35%), V. parahaemolyticus (22.5%), V. mimicus (19.1%), V. alginolyticus (15.8%) and V. vulnificus (11.6%), were present in the water samples. The vibriophages, V. vulnificus ɸ (17.5%), V. alginolyticus ɸ (17.5%), V. parahaemolyticus ɸ (10%), V. cholerae non-O1/O139 ɸ (26.6%) and V. mimicus ɸ (9.1%), were also detected in these samples. The highest number of Vibrios were noted in the monsoon (20–34°C), and to a lesser extent, in the summer (24–36°C) seasons. Samples positive for phages for any of the identified Vibrio species were mostly devoid of that particular bacterial organism and vice versa. The detection of toxin genes and resistance to β-lactam antibiotics in some environmental enteropathogenic Vibrio species in the aquatic niches is a significant outcome. This finding is instrumental in the south Bengal diarrhoeal incidence.

Introduction

Diarrheal outbreak, a major public health concern in India, is more palpable across the deltaic peninsula of Gangetic West Bengal, a century old diarrhoea endemic zone [13]. Vibrios are one of the common etiological agent of diarrheal disease including cholera; gastrointestinal infections, septicaemia etc [46]. They are ubiquitous in fresh water, riverine-estuarine environment and have been isolated customarily from coastal zones in most continents [1, 79].

Till date majority of the epidemiological and environmental investigations have been focussed towards the understanding of the aetiology of riverine-estuarine V. cholerae O1, the most common cholera pathogen, along with south Bengal cholera paradigm [10, 11]. But several other species of Vibrios including V. cholerae non-O1/O139, V. vulnificus, V. alginolyticus, V. parahaemolyticus, V. fluvialis and V. mimicus are also responsible for diarrhea, gastroenteritis, necrotizing fasciitis, various other skin diseases and septicemia affecting humans worldwide through water contact and consumption [6, 1214]. Evidences are galore that the rate of infection caused by Vibrio spp. has increased over the past few years [15]. V. cholerae non-O1/O139 are found to be associated with severe traits of gastroenteric infection indicating their role in diarrhoea [3, 16]. V. parahaemolyticus of specific serotypes are also associated with diarrheal outbreaks in several parts of the world with the earliest cases being reported from Kolkata, India in 1996 [17]. Even V. fluvialis has also been reported to induce waterborne diarrhoea in deltaic south Bengal [1820].

In the coastal zone of the Bay of Bengal, seawater intrusion has been a major concern. As the altitude of this region is low, even a small increase in sea-level may have a significant impact on water regime of the coastal area and the delta of West Bengal in the south-eastern part of India. Apart from the study on V. cholerae O1 and its phages [11], very little has been done to evaluate the ecology of enteropathogenic Vibrios and their phages in different but related coastal environments including river and estuaries, despite the perception that this could provide information regarding the early warning and understanding its relation to human vulnerability to the disease [21] in these diarrhoea endemic Gangetic delta of eastern India (West Bengal).

Few earlier works in different aquatic ecosystem hypothesized that different physico-chemical attributes of the aquatic environment affect the abundance, physiological state and pathogenic potential of Vibrio spp. [12, 22, 23]. But so far no longitudinal study has ever been undertaken to solve the environmental mystery.

With this basic contextual information, in a yearlong field based study, we attempted to investigate and identify the seasonal abundance pattern and distribution of toxigenic Vibrios (with enteropathogenic potentiality) and their phages under changing physico-chemical patterns and environmental drivers in riverine and brackish water environment of south Bengal. This study also aims to ascertain the correlation of environmental factors and enteropathogenic Vibrios in understanding their contribution on the diarrheal incidence pattern in the lower Gangetic delta of India.

Materials and Methods

Ethical Statement

No specific permissions were required for these locations/activities. The selected sites were accessible to common people and not situated within restricted area, thus no permissions were required to access them. It is further confirmed that the study did not involve any endangered or protected species.

Sampling

During January 2009 to December 2009, a total of 120 water samples were collected from the three sampling sites (40 samples from each site) on the Hooghly River, the main arm of the river Ganges flowing through the southern deltaic West Bengal. The sites were selected based on their respective distances from the sea mouth and navigability (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Study area, showing three study points.

Fig 1

Study sites

Site I. (Howrah; 130km. inland from sea mouth; 22.59°N, 88.31°E):

It lies beside the densely populated city of Kolkata, India. Apart from drinking purposes, water from this area is also accessed for multiple household chores like washing, bathing, cleaning utensils, religious rituals etc. Untreated sewage disposal occurs aplenty from both the banks into the river.

Site II. (Diamond Harbour; 80km. inland from sea mouth; 22.20°N, 88.20°E):

Here river flows through a semi-urban set up. Being in the nearer vicinity to the sea mouth, it is wider with higher aquatic turbulence and receives greater amount of marine brackish water during flood tide. Human intrusion is lesser at this site owing to lower populace, strong water current and greater water exchange with the sea.

Site III. (Kakdwip; 30km. inland from sea mouth; 21.88°N, 88.18°E):

It’s in a rural focus in the district of South 24 Parganas in West Bengal with consistent reports of diarrhoeal endemicity. The river is widest at Site III and records the highest tidal effect among the 3 study sites (Fig 1).

Sample Collection procedure

Sampling was carried out every fortnight, in order to embrace the effect of hydrological changes due to alternating high and low tides, as well as during increasing and decreasing moon phases. At each sampling day, 5 samples were collected at regular intervals (every 2 h) covering a 10–12 h period of a tidal cycle including low and high tides. During each sample collection, three to four subsamples of surface water from the midstream were taken with a metal bucket and pooled together in a sterile 10 L container. Subsequently, the samples were shaken and divided into 1 L aliquots.

Immediately after sample collection, temperature, pH, conductivity, turbidity and salinity were measured with a Thermo Orion Multi-meter (pH probe [9157BNMD refillable epoxy pH/ATC triode] and conductivity probe [013605MD K = 0.55] duraprobe). Turbidity was expressed as Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU) and salinity was expressed as parts per thousand (ppt). After determination of physico-chemical variants, water samples were transported to the central laboratory in sterile 1L glass bottles at 4°C in dark thermocol boxes.

Bacteriological Analysis

The samples were processed in accordance with the standard microbiological procedure as described elsewhere [1]. Suspected Vibrio colonies were subjected to biochemical confirmation using HIVIBRIO kit (Himedia, India). Biochemically suspected Vibrio isolates were further subjected to molecular identification by multiplex PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction), targeting the dnaJ gene for the 5 pathogenic Vibrio species viz. V. cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus, V. vulnificus, V. alginolyticus and V. mimicus [24].

Phenotypic Characterization

PCR confirmed Vibrio isolates were further subjected to the salt tolerance test [25]. All the confirmed Vibrio isolates of the 5 enteropathogenic species were tested for antibiotic sensitivity pattern by disc diffusion method [26] with commercially available disks (Becton Dickinson, USA).

Genotypic Characterization

PCR was performed with purified genomic DNA as template from all the isolated enteropathogenic Vibrios for the detection of the species specific toxin genes associated with pathogenicity of the particular Vibrio species. The reaction mixtures consisted of 10X PCR reaction buffer, 2.5mM DNTP mixture, 1.5 mmol l-1 MgCl2, 100 nmol l-1of primer, 1 U Taq polymerase (Genie, Merck) and 2 μl of template DNA. Nucleotide sequence of the primers and the conditions of the PCR are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. List of toxin genes, their primer sequences and PCR conditions.
Gene Primer Sequence (5’-3’) Denaturing Annealing Extension Reference
ctxA F-5’CTCAGACGGGATTTGTTAGGCACG 3’ 94°C, 90S 60°C, 90S 72°C, 90S 1 (S1 Reference)
R-5’TCTATCTCTGTAGCCCCTATTACG 3’
tcpA Classical F-5’CACGATAAGAAAACCGGTCAAGAG 3’ 94°C, 90S 60°C, 90S 72°C, 90S 1 (S1 Reference)
R-5’ACCAAATGCAACGCCGAATGGAGC 3’
tcpA El Tor F-5’GAAGAAGTTTGTAAAAGAAGAACAC 3’ 94°C, 90S 60°C, 90S 72°C, 90S 1 (S1 Reference)
R-5’GAAAGGACCTTCTTTCACGTTG 3’
toxR(V. cholerae) F-5’CGGGATCCATGTTCGGATTAGGACAC 3’ 94°C, 30S 64°C, 30S 72°C, 30S 2 (S1 Reference)
R-5’CGGGATCCTACTCACACACTTTGATGGC 3’
toxT F-5’ACTGTCGACGCAAAGCATATTCAGAGA3’ 94°C, 40S 55°C, 40S 72°C, 90S 3 (S1 Reference)
R-5’CGCGGATCCATACAATCGAAAATAGGA 3’
RJ F-5’TCGTTAGCGTGTCGGTTCGCAGG 3’ 94°C, 40S 55°C, 40S 72°C, 90S 4 (S1 Reference)
R-5’TGCTTTGTACCAGTCACAGATAG 3’
LJ F-5’GTGAATCTTGATGAGACGCTCTG 3’ 94°C, 40S 55°C, 40S 72°C, 60S 4 (S1 Reference)
R-5’GGTGAGCCAGGCTTATTTGGG 3’
zot F-5’TCGCTTAACGATGGCGCGTTTT-3’ 94°C, 60s 60°C, 60s 72°C, 60s 5 (S1 Reference)
R-5’AACCCCGTTTCACTTCTACCCA-3’
tdh (V. parahaemolyticus) F-5’GGTACTAAATGGCTGACATC-3’ 94°C, 120s 50°C, 120s 72°C, 30s 6 (S1 Reference)
R-5’CCACTACCACTCTCATATGC-3’
toxR (V. parahaemolyticus& V. alginolyticus) F-5’GATTAGGAAGCAACGAAAG 3’ 94°C, 60S 54°C, 60S 72°C, 60S 7 (S1 Reference)
R-5’GCAATCACTTCCACTGGTAAC 3’
tlh F-5’AGCGGATTATGCAGAAGCAC 3’ 94°C, 60S 54°C, 60S 72°C, 60S 7 (S1 Reference)
R1-5’GCTACTTTCTAGCATTTTCTCTGC 3’
R2-5’ATCTCAAGCACTTTCGCACG 3’
vvh F-5’CTCACTGGGGCAGTGGCT 3’ 94°C, 15S 58°C, 15S 72°C, 20S 8 (S1 Reference)
R-5’CCAGCCGTTAACCGAACCA 3’
tdh (V. mimicus) F-5’GGTACTAAATGGCTGACATC 3’ 94°C, 30S 55°C, 30S 72°C, 30S 9 (S1 Reference)
R-5’CCACTACCACTCTCATATGC 3’
vmh F-5’GGTAGCCATCAGTCTTATCACG 3’ 94°C, 30S 55°C, 30S 72°C, 30S 9 (S1 Reference)
R-5’ATCGTGTCCCAATACTTCACCG 3’

Vibriophage assay

All riverine-estuarine samples were subjected to the identification of five vibriophages of the afore-mentioned five enteropathogenic Vibrio species, following a standard protocol [27, 28] with certain modifications. Briefly, each sample was membrane filtered through 0.22μm (Millipore) membrane and 10ml of the filtrate was mixed with 100μl of MgCl2.6H2O and kept at 37°C for 5 min. Thereafter, the mixture was mixed with 1ml of log phase culture of each of the standard strains of 5 identified Vibrio spp. and 10 ml of melted Luria Agar (BD, USA). Subsequently, the mixture, poured in a petridish, was kept at room temperature to solidify. Afterwards, the plates were incubated overnight at 37°C and Vibriophages were identified by the formation of plaques.

Statistical Analysis

The results have been analysed statistically applying correlation methods to compare the physico-chemical parameters of water samples and presence of Vibrios. For comparisons of parameters each sample data were considered. Further correlations probability values < 0.05 were considered significant. The analysis was done by using Epi Info (Ver 3.5.1. USA).

Results

Water samples collected from the riverine estuarine sources were analysed for different physico-chemical indices as well as for the entero-pathogenic Vibrios, their toxicity and for Vibriophages.

Physico-chemical Analysis

Throughout the study period, water temperature oscillated between 17.3 to 34.7°C at Howrah, between 15.1 to 35.6°C at Diamond Harbour and 13.4 to 35.6°C at Kakdwip, without any significant variation amongst respective sampling sites. pH level varied between 7.10–8.13 at Howrah site, 7.1–7.96 at Diamond Harbour and 7.67–8.26 at Kakdwip respectively with a basic alkaline drift. Salinity level at Site I (Howrah) always remained <0.1ppt and yearlong salinity gradient varied between 0.2–4.7 ppt. at Site II (Diamond Harbour) and 6.6–14.2 ppt. at Site III (Kakdwip) respectively. Turbidity was slightly higher at Diamond Harbour varying between 86 to 723 NTU, compared to Howrah (32 to 589 NTU) and Kakdwip (6 to 103 NTU).

Enteric Vibrios

V. parahaemolyticus could be isolated from 27/120 (22.5%) samples, being mostly prevalent in the high saline zone (Site III) (21/27), to some lesser extent at Diamond Harbour (6/21) and was completely absent at Howrah (Fig 1). 19 samples (15.8%) were found to harbour V. alginolyticus and V. vulnificus could be isolated from 14 (11.6%) samples. Both V. alginolyticus and V. vulnificus could be detected from all the three sampling sites, with a slightly higher preponderance at Site III (Fig 1). V. mimicus was isolated from 23 water samples (19.1%) with highest preponderance at Site I (12/23), followed by Site II (8/23) and Site III (3/23) respectively (Fig 1). V. cholerae non-O1/O139 was the most prevalent enteropathogen among all the five species of non-cholera Vibrios, which was present in 42 (35%) water samples. Highest abundance of V. cholerae non-O1/O139 was also observed at Site I (24/42) at salinity <0.1ppt. V. cholerae O1 was present in 19 (15.8%) water samples and showed distinct seasonality as reported in our earlier studies [11]. Seasonal prevalence of Vibrios was highest in the monsoon months (20–34°C), followed by summer (24–36°C) and winter (13–18°C) months respectively. Irrespective of any organism or any site, monsoon seems to be the most favourable condition with maximum isolation rate achieved during the period.

Salt Tolerance test

It was evident from the salt tolerance test that V. parahaemolyticus had higher survival rate at higher (2–10%) salt concentration, whereas V. cholerae non-O1/O139 showed their sustenance at < 1.5% salt concentrations. V. alginolytiocus, V. vulnificus and V. mimicus showed maximum viability at <3% salt concentrations.

Toxin genes

The toxin gene identification of the 5 enteropathogenic Vibrio species revealed a lesser degree of existence of toxin genes in the environmental isolates (Table 2). While, presence of accessory cholera toxin genes like tcp, Zot, toxR have been detected from riverine-estuarine V. cholerae isolates, V. parahaemolyticus harboured toxR and tdh genes. Simultaneously toxin genes like vmh and tdh were present in the V.mimicus isolates. Among V. vulnificus population, hemolysin gene (vvh) was present and thermolabile hemolysin gene (tlh) was detected among V. alginolyticus.

Table 2. Detection rate (%) of entero-pathogenic Vibrio species with toxin genes.

Organisms Total no. of isolates ctxA tcpA Classical tcpAEl Tor ToxR toxT RJ &LJ Zot tdh tlh vvh vmh
V. cholerae 42 0 0 4.7% 23.8% 2.3% 11.9% 16.6% 0 0 0 0
V. parahaemolyticus 27 0 0 0 22.2% 0 0 0 14.8% 0 0 0
V. alginolyticus 19 0 0 0 21.0% 0 0 0 0 10.5% 0 0
V. vulnificus 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.1% 0
V. mimicus 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.3% 0 0 26.1%

Vibriophage analysis

Phages of both V. vulnificus and V. alginolyticus could be detected in 21 riverine-estuarine water samples. Higher preponderance of V. vulnificus phage and V. alginolyticus phage was observed at Kakdwip (Site III) followed by Diamond Harbour (Site II) and Howrah (Site I). Likewise, V. parahaemolyticus phage was detected from 12 riverine-estuarine samples collected only from high saline zone of Kakdwip (Site III). On the contrary, V. cholerae non-O1/O139 phage could be traced in 32 samples collected from Howrah and Diamond Harbour. A lesser persistence of V. cholerae non-O1/O139 phage has been observed at the high saline regions during monsoon. V.mimicus phage showed a greater prevalence at Site II and Site I than that of Site III, being present in 11 samples. Irrespective of study sites, higher load of Vibriophages has always been noted in monsoon months followed by summer and winter (Fig 2).

Fig 2. Seasonal abundance of enteric Vibrio species at all the sampling sites.

Fig 2

Antibiotic sensitivity Profile

Irrespective of any species and retention of any toxin genes, more than 80% of the identified enteric Vibrio isolates were sensitive to streptomycin, chloramphenicol, cotrimoxazole, tetracycline, fluoroquinolone and cephalosporin, whereas 75% of the Vibrio isolates showed resistance to β-lactam derivatives and 40% were resistant to the furazolidone.

Discussion

A salinity dependant zone demarcation can therefore be drawn from the yearlong evaluation of the salinity gradients of the water samples collected from the three study sites, viz. a “sweet water” or “no saline” zone (Site I; Howrah; <0.1ppt), a “medium saline” zone (Site II; Diamond Harbour; 0.1–5 ppt) and a “high saline” zone (Site III; Kakdwip; 6–15ppt), where the water salinity is inversely proportional to their proximity from the sea mouth. At site II and III, highest salinity was experienced during the summer months, attributable to greater inflow of the sea water. On the contrary lowest salinities were recorded during rainy season due to heavy downpours coupled with mixing of flood water from the adjoining areas, release of water from dams etc.

Water temperature varied uniformly at all the three study sites, with the highest recorded temperature in the summer followed by monsoon months and the lowest temperature in winter. The pH remained at a constant (7.6±0.5) at all the three study sites and showed its basic alkaline nature. A slightly elevated pH at Diamond Harbour can be explained by its higher water turbulence resulting in re-suspension of sediments ensuing in higher turbidity as well as pH. However, highest alkalinity during monsoon months could be attributed to the inflow of the flood water, from the adjoining surroundings, which carry in large amount of organic debris.

Among potentially enteropathogenic Vibrios, prevalence of V. parahaemolyticus in riverine-estuarine environment was directly proportional to the salinity gradient with its highest abundance at Kakdwip (21/27) (Site III; high saline zone) decreasing gradually along with the decrease in salinity being almost undetectable at Howrah. Irrespective of any seasonal fluctuation, consistently higher preponderance of V. parahaemolyticus at high saline zone indicates their halophilic environmental preference. Statistically, highly significant association between salinity and V. parahaemolyticus (Table 3) can be attributed to its salt tolerance capacity (2–10% salt concentration) as also evident from the salt tolerance test. Simultaneously, their presence at mid saline zone (Diamond Harbour) during summer and monsoon demonstrate their osmo-regulation capacity as well as a seasonal inland invasion along with marine saline water. V.parahaemolyticus showed positive correlation with temperature and tide (Table 3). V. parahaemolyticus phage could only be detected from 10% (12/120) of the samples, all of which were collected from Site III viz. Kakdwip (high saline zone). Presence of V. parahaemolyticus phage in high saline environment again indicates the preference of saline region as a suitable niche.

Table 3. Statistical correlation between physico-chemical variants and abundance of different enetropathogenic Vibrio species.

TEMP (OC) SAL (PSU) TURB (NTU) TIDE V.cholerae V. parahaemolyticus V. alginolyticus V. mimicus V. vulnificus
TEMP (OC) X + NS NS ++ ++ ++ ++ ++
SAL (PSU) X + ++ - ++ + - +
TURB (NTU) X NS ++ - + ++ +
TIDE X + ++ + + +
V.cholerae X - NS ++ NS
V. parahaemolyticus X NS - NS
V. alginolyticus X NS +
V. mimicus X +
V. vulnificus X

++ indicate (P < 0.001) highly significant positive correlation, + indicate (p < 0.05) significant positive correlation, NS indicate (p > 0.05) not significant, - indicate (p < 0.05) significant negative correlation.

Similarly, V. alginolyticus (15.8% samples) and V. vulnificus (11.6% samples) distribution pattern also reflected higher preponderance at higher salinity zone, with significant association with salinity, despite its presence in other two sites as well. This pattern is possibly attributable to their greater salt tolerance (up to 3%) capacity coupled with osmo-regularity. V. vulnificus and V. alginolyticus also showed their positive correlation with temperature, turbidity and tide (Table 3). V. vulnificus phage and V. alginolyticus phage was present in higher number of samples, 17.5% each, more than that of V. parahaemolyticus (Fig 3). Higher abundance of their phages has been observed at high saline region. Coexistence of V. alginolyticus, V. vulnificus and V. parahaemolyticus in estuarine environment indicates their suitability in high saline condition, whereas, increasing number of diarrhoeal cases by these bacterial agents in inland Gangetic delta vindicate their transmission capability and adaptability in the sweet water environment.

Fig 3. Seasonal abundance of species specific Vibriophages at all the sampling sites.

Fig 3

Dispositional variation of V. cholerae (35% of the samples) and V. mimicus (19.1% samples) was inversely proportional with the riverine salinity gradient (increase in salinity decreases their preponderance). Significant association with turbidity has been noticed for V. cholerae and V. mimicus abundance (Table 3). Presence of V. cholerae in low saline region in Hooghly river is another evidential proof of environmental stimulus in south Bengal cholera menace [11]. V. cholerae non-O1/O139 phages (26.6% samples) were present in samples collected from all the sampling sites. Higher preponderance of V. cholerae non-O1/O139 phage was detected from Howrah followed by Diamond Harbour and Kakdwip respectively. V. mimicus phage was present in 9.1% samples isolated mostly from Howrah, a phenomenon, which reflects their prevalence in low saline zone. Therefore, dynamics of V. cholerae and V. mimicus at inland sites of Hooghly river establish the critical role of Hooghly riverine-estuarine ecosystem in south Bengal diarrheal incidence.

Abundance of vibriophages in the riverine estuarine environment indicates a strong seasonal association, where it has been observed that all the phages showed their highest availability during monsoon period irrespective of any sites. Thus it can be hypothesised that alkaline pH along with higher load of organic debris enhances the propagation of the vibriophages during monsoon. At all the sites, solitary existence of either the vibriophages or their respective hosts (Vibrios) has been noticed, which indicate the dominance of any one of the entity (either vibrio or vibriophages) (Fig 4), similar to our previous observations for V. cholerae O1 [11]. Therefore it can be concluded that phages can be a potential delimiting factor for its host in the aquatic environment.

Fig 4. The species specific abundance of Vibrio, Vibriophages, their coexistence and solitary existence at all the sampling sites.

Fig 4

Ecological conditions of riverine-estuarine environment and abundance of enteric Vibrios established a distinct relation between different abiotic factors like water temperature and salinity with the presence of enteric Vibrios and its phages (Table 3).

From seasonal distribution pattern of enteropathogenic Vibrios, monsoon seems to be the most conducive for their preponderance in riverine-estuarine environment. Although heavy rainfall alters the physico-chemical indices in the aquatic milieu, subsequent intrusion of flood water along with organic debris facilitate the growth of the potential enteropathogenic Vibrios.

Among the pool of environmental enteric bacteria, isolated from estuarine region, this is the first study which reports the retention of toxin genes among them. However, toxin genes, that could be found among the environmental isolates were neither in complete cassettes (absence of ctx or tcp gene), nor in high frequency as also observed in clinical studies from the same focus [16]. These observations support our earlier hypothesis of genetic modification of Vibrios through acquisition of genes in aquatic environment [29, 30]. Identification of toxin genes among environmental enteric Vibrios is a very important outcome which can explain the emergence of non cholera Vibrios as aetiological agents of diarrhoeal menace. Detection of tcpA El Tor gene which encodes the pilus colonization factor in two (2) ctxA negative environmental V. cholerae isolates, along with toxT gene indicate their colonization potential in gut environment [31]. Previous reports corroborates the prevalence of rtxA, hlyA and zot genes in the environmental V. cholerae isolates [31], and these genes can also impart virulence to these V. cholerae isolates.

The tdh and toxR genes could also be detected in the V. parahaemolyticus isolates of aquatic origin indicating their virulence potential and capability of causing gastroenteritis. The presence of the virulence genes as toxR and tlh in V. alginolyticus, tdh and vmh in V. mimicus suggests that other non-cholera Vibrio species like V. alginolyticus and V. mimicus may also be important reservoirs of many known virulence genes in the aquatic environment. The presence of the vvhA gene which encodes a cytotoxin hemolysin protein in V. vulnificus isolate of aquatic origin is a unique natural phenomenon reported herewith for the first time.

The presence of these toxin genes in the Vibrios isolated from the aquatic environment indicates the presence of these genes in the aquatic niches and the possible role of the physico-chemical and environmental attributes in the horizontal gene transfer which appears to take place in the Gangetic riverine estuarine ecosystem as a regular phenomenon, as has been reported earlier in V. cholerae [30].

The observed Vibrio dynamics can very significantly be extrapolated on the diarrheal incidence pattern in southern districts of West Bengal, where from a steady report of higher numbers of diarrheal incidences are recorded every year, showing a parallel incidence peak in monsoon followed by summer months [1, 17, 32]. Abundance of Vibrios in the monsoon months may therefore be conclusively attributed to conducive environmental and hydrological indices (temperature, humidity, salinity etc.) coupled with inflow of turbid flood water of increased suspended particulate matter (SPM) into the riverine system brought in by sweeping of organic debris and fecal disposals.

In most developing countries, the treatment of diarrheal diseases by an inadequate quantity of irrationally selected antimicrobials, without any identification/knowledge of causative pathogen is common and is a major contributing factor for multidrug resistances [10]. Since the antibiotic resistant pattern of some enteropathogenic bacteria showed a higher resistance against multiple antibiotics [10], isolation of drug susceptible enteropathogenic Vibrios indicates their lack of earlier exposures to different antibiotics in the environmental condition. In spite of showing sensitivity towards most of the conventional antibiotics, the observed resistance to the β-lactam group derivatives highlights that these Vibrio community has the potential of acquiring other antibiotic resistant genes enroute inland river water under amiable environmental oscillations [30] or may possibly by usage of the MATE efflux pump to acquire the antibiotic resistance (Batabyal et al, Unpublished data).

In developing countries a large population depends on treated surface waters for drinking, conventional usages and that riverine surface water also contains large number of the different enteropathogenic Vibrios with toxin genes and resistance to some antibiotics, resulting in the diarrheal diseases by the fecal–oral contamination [10]. Thus it is of the utmost importance for the common people to avoid direct usage of the natural waters and it is strongly recommended to equip the healthcare system in the third world countries (where diarrhea is a usual entity) for “safe water supply” by under taking regular planned potable water surveillance.

Conclusion

Thereby it is convincingly established that Gangetic riverine-estuarine aquatic ecosystem regulates the survival, distribution and transmission of diarrheogenic Vibrios from its saline habitat to inland fresh water riverine ecosystem, where it can adversely affect human health. Although a flowing aquatic ecosystem like river Ganges harbours different types of bacterial community, detection of entero-pathogenic Vibrios along with its phages, the first of its kind, through a yearlong systematic surveillance indicate the role of Gangetic riverine-estuarine ecosystem, on sustained diarrhoeal disease transmission in south Bengal. Further, the retention of toxin genes within Vibrio indicates the possibility of aquatic environment induced genetic modification in these Vibrios as has been earlier been demonstrated elsewhere [30] in V. cholerae O1 and may thereby pose a very serious threat of unknown dimension to human health. Current observation of aquatic environmental circulation of enteropathogenic Vibrios along the riverine-estuarine gradient also necessitates further long term studies on Vibrio dynamics emphasizing their pathogenicity for a comprehensive understanding of the seasonal occurrence of Vibrio induced diarrhoea in this endemic focus.

Supporting Information

S1 Reference. References for the toxin genes, their primers & PCR conditions.

(DOCX)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information file.

Funding Statement

The authors have no support or funding to report.

References

  • 1. Batabyal P, Mookerjee S, Palit A. Occurrence of toxigenic Vibrio cholerae in accessible water sources of cholera endemic foci in India. Jap J Infect Dis. 2012; 65: 358–360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Palit A, Batabyal P, Kanungo S, Sur D. In-house contamination of potable water in urban slum of Kolkata, India: a possible transmission route of diarrhea. Water Sci Technol. 2012; 66: 299–303. 10.2166/wst.2012.177 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Nair GB, Ramamurthy T, Bhattacharya MK, Krishnan T, Ganguly S, Saha DR, et al. Emerging trends in the etiology of enteric pathogens as evidenced from an active surveillance of hospitalized diarrhoeal patients in Kolkata, India. Gut Pathogens. 2010; 2: 4 10.1186/1757-4749-2-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Thompson FL, Iida T, Swings J. Biodiversity of Vibrios. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004; 68:403–431 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. WHO Cholera. World Health Organisation. Weekly epidemiological record. 2006; 81: 297–308. 16888873 [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Palit A, Nair GB. Bacteria: Other Vibrios In: Motarjemi Y editor. Encyclopedia of Food Safety, Volume 1: History, Science and Methods, Elsevier; 2013. pp 570–573. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Barbieri E, Falzano L, Fiorentini C, Pianetti A, Baffone W, Fabbri A, et al. Occurrence, diversity and pathogenicity of halophillic Vibrio spp. and non-O1 Vibrio cholerae from estuarine waters along the Italian Adriatic coast. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999; 65: 2748–2753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Epstein PR, Ford TE, Colwell R. Marine ecosystem. Lancet. 1993; 342: 1216–1219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Mahmud ZH, Kassu A, Mohammad A, Yamato M, Bhuiyan NA, Nair GB, et al. Isolation and molecular characterization of toxigenic V. parahaemolyticus from the Kii Channel, Japan. Microbiol Res. 2006; 161: 645–657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Batabyal P, Mookerjee S, Sur D, Palit A. Diarrheogenic Escherichia coli in potable water sources of West Bengal, India. Acta Trop. 2013; 127: 153–157. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2013.04.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Mookerjee S, Jaiswal A, Batabyal P, Einsporn MH, Lara RJ, Sarkar B, et al. Seasonal dynamics of Vibrio cholerae and its phages in riverine ecosystem of Gangetic West Bengal: cholera paradigm. Environ Monit Assess. 2014; 186(10):6241–50. 10.1007/s10661-014-3851-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Batabyal P, Einsporn MH, Mookerjee S, Palit http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969713012370-af0005 A, Neogi http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969713012370-af0015 SB, Nair GB, et al. Influence of hydrologic and anthropogenic factors on the abundance variability of enteropathogens in the Ganges estuary, a cholera endemic region, Sci total Environ. 2014; 472:154–161. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 13. Mead PS, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCraig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, et al. Food related illness and death in the United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 1999; 5(5): 607–625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Oliver JD, Kaper JB. Vibrio species In: Doyle MP, Beuchat LR, Montville TJ, editors. Food Microbiology: Fundamentals and Frontiers. 2nd Edition ASM Press, Washington, DC: 2001. pp 263–300. [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Bross MH, Soch K, Morales R, Mitchell RB. Vibrio vulnificus infection: diagnosis and treatment Am Fam Physician. 2007; 76(4): 539–544. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Dutta D, Chowdhury G, Pazhani GP, Guin S, Dutta S, et al. Vibrio cholerae non-O1, non-O139 serogroups and cholera-like diarrhea, Kolkata, India. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013; 19: 464–467. 10.3201/eid1903.121156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Kanungo S, Sur D, Ali M, You YA, Pal D, Manna B, et al. Clinical, epidemiological, and spatial characteristics of Vibrio parahaemolyticus diarrhea and cholera in the urban slums of Kolkata, India. BMC Publ Health. 2012; 12: 830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Bhattacharjee S, Bhattacharjee S, Bal B, Pal R, Niyogi S, Sarkar K. Is Vibrio fluvialis emerging as a pathogen with epidemic potential in coastal region of eastern India following cyclone AILA? J Heal Popul Nutrition. 2010; 28: 311–317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Chowdhury G, Pazhani GP, Dutta D, Guin S, Dutta S, Ghosh S, et al. Vibrio fluvialis in Patients with Diarrhea, Kolkata, India. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012; 18: 1868–1871. 10.3201/eid1811.120520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Ramamurthy T, Chowdhury G, Pazhani GP, Shinoda S. Vibrio fluvialis: an emerging pathogen. Front Microbiol. 2014; 5: 91 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Constantin de Magny G, Murtugudde R, Sapiano MRP, Nizam A, Brown CW, Busalacchi AJ, et al. Environmental signatures associated with cholera epidemics. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008; 105(46): 17676–81. 10.1073/pnas.0809654105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Paul D, Mahmud ZH, Islam Md S, Neogi SB, Islam Md S, Jahid IK. Physio-chemical conditions and contamination with Vibrios of surface water at Matlab, Bangladesh. J Microbiol Biotechnol Food Sci. 2012; 2:713–729. [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Rhodes M, Bhaskaran H, Jacobs J. Short-term variation in the abundance of V.vulnificus and V.parahaemolyticus in a tidal estuary. J Mar Biol Oceanogr. 2013; 2: 2 10.4172/2324-8661.1000109 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Nhung PH, Ohkusu K, Miyasaka J, Suna SX, Ezaki T. Rapid and specific identification of 5 human pathogenic Vibrio species by multiplex polymerase chain reaction targeted to dnaJ gene. Diagnos Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007; 59: 271–275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Chakraborty R, Sinha S, Mukhopadhyay AK, Asakura M, Yamasaki S, Bhattacharya SK, et al. Species-specific identification of Vibrio fluvialis by PCR targeted to the conserved transcriptional activation and variable membrane tether regions of toxR gene. J Med Microbiol. 2006; 55: 805–808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. American J Clin Pathol. 1966; 45: 493–496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.US EPA. April 2001. 821-R-01–029. Method 1601: Method 1602: Male-specific (F+) and Somatic Coliphage in Water by Single Agar Layer (SAL) Procedure. EPA, Washington, D.C. 20460. Available: http://www.epa.gov/nerlcwww/documents/1602ap01.pdf.
  • 28. Mookerjee S, Batabyal P, Halder M, Palit A. Specificity of coliphages in evaluating marker efficacy: A new insight for water quality indicators. J Vir Met. 2014; 208: 115–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Batabyal P, Mookerjee S, Einsporn MH, Lara RJ, Palit A. High prevalence of toxin producing enteropathogenic Vibrios among estuarine crab in Ganges delta of West Bengal, India. Infect Gene Evol. 2014; 26: 359–361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Palit A, Batabyal P. Toxigenic Vibrio cholerae from environmental sources associated with the cholera outbreak after AILA cyclone in West Bengal, India. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2010; 51: 241–243. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2010.02873.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Chatterjee S, Ghosh K, Raychoudhuri A, Chowdhury G, Bhattacharya MK, Mukhopadhyay AK, et al. Association of non-O1, non-O139 Vibrio cholerae among hospitalized diarrheal patients at Kolkata: a study on incidence, virulence factors and clonality among clinical strains. J Clin Microbiol. 2009; 47: 1087–1095. 10.1128/JCM.02026-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.WHO. KOBE Report. 2011. Available: www.who.or.jp/publications/2011/reportkolkata finaljune11.pdf.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Reference. References for the toxin genes, their primers & PCR conditions.

(DOCX)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information file.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES