Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Fertil Steril. 2015 Jun 11;104(3):612–619.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.05.017

Table 2.

Outcomes Among All Stimulated* Cycles versus those Clinically Assigned as DOR

*Cycles with a daily FSH dose = 0 or missing were excluded

2004 Cycles 2011 Cycles Combined 2004 and 2011

ALL STIMULATED CYCLES: All (N=84,099) Age <40y (N=66,779) All (N=90,102) Age <40y (N=68,642) All (N=174,201) Age <40y (N=135,421)
POR; N (%) 13,088b (16) 8,299a (12) 13,508b (15) 7,549a (11) 26,596 (15) 15,848 (12)
# Oocytes retrieved; (Mean ± SD) 12.4 ± 7.8e 13.2 ± 7.9f 12.3 ± 7.8 e 13.3 ± 7.9f 12.4 ± 7.8 13.3 ± 7.9
Live Birth; N (%) 23,231a (28) 21,375a (32) 26,920a (30) 24,375a (35) 50,151 (29) 45,750 (34)

DOR SUBSETS: All DOR (N=15,752) DOR Age<40y (N=7,952) All DOR (N=23,559) DOR Age<40y (N=11,457) All DOR (N=39,311) Age<40y (N=19,409)

POR; N (%) 5,004c (32) 2,331d (29) 7,123c (30) 3,095d (27) 12,127 (31) 5,403 (28)
# Oocytes retrieved; (Mean ± SD) 8.3 ± 5.9 8.8 ± 6.1 8.3 ± 5.9 8.8 ± 6.1 8.3 ± 5.9 8.8 ± 6.1
Live Birth; N (%) 2,357a (15) 1,693a (21) 4,003a (17) 2,811a (24) 6,360 (16) 4,504 (23)

2004 vs. 2011:

a

p<0.0001;

b

p=0.0009;

c

p=0.0013;

d

p=0.0001;

e

p=0.0318;

f

p=0.0023