Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug;7(8):1286–1297. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.04.04

Table 4. Comparison of the transcutaneous electrical stimulation vs. hypoglossal nerve stimulation.

Non-invasive stimulation Hypoglossal nerve stimulation
Current intensity ++ ++
Efficacy + ++
Cost Low High
Long term follow up +
Effect on cardiovascular parameters +
Application ++
Stimulation Triggered, continuous Triggered, continuous
Target Unspecific Specific
Type of stimulation Bilateral Unilateral
Adverse events Local skin irritation +++
Set up Patches, skin electrodes Surgical intervention
Current level of evidence according to latest guidelines (49) C C

+, more or available; –, less or unavailable.