Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 1;14(19):1–72.

Table A3:

GRADE Evidence Profile for Timing of Patient Care Planning Discussions

Number of Studies (Design) Risk of Bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Publication Bias Upgrade Considerations Quality
Patient's Quality of Life
1 (observational) Serious limitations (−1)a No serious limitations No serious limitations No serious limitations Undetected Dose-response gradient (+1) ⊕⊕ Low
Receiving Chemotherapy at End of Life
1 (observational) Serious limitations (−1)b No serious limitations No serious limitations No serious limitations Undetected Large magnitude of effect (+1) ⊕⊕ Low
Receiving Hospital Care
1 (observational) Serious limitations (−1)b No serious limitations No serious limitations No serious limitations Undetected Large magnitude of effect (+1) Dose-response gradient (+1) ⊕⊕⊕ Moderate
Intensive Care Unit Care
1 (observational) Serious limitations (−1)b No serious limitations No serious limitations No serious limitations Undetected Large magnitude of effect (+1) ⊕⊕ Low
Receiving Hospice Care
1 (observational) Serious limitations (−1)b No serious limitations No serious limitations No serious limitations Undetected Large magnitude of effect (+1) Dose-response gradient (+1) ⊕⊕⊕ Moderate

Abbreviations: GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation; RCT, randomized controlled trial.

a

Information about what variables were adjusted for in the multivariable model was missing.

b

Observational study suffered from limitations in how the exposure was measured and in confounding.