Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 6;2015(8):CD008736. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008736.pub2

5. Vector density: ITNs versus no intervention.

Trial ID Unit of randomization Intervention Main vector Measure
 (method) Pre‐intervention Post‐intervention Effect measure (95% CI) or P value
ITNs Control ITNs Control
Chowdhury 2011 BGD Cluster of 50 houses PermaNet® 2.0 (deltamethrin 55mg/m²) distributed to all households in November 2006. P. argentipes Total sandflies
(monthly collections from 40 houses using light traps).
724
 (October 2006) 683
 (October 2006) 18 (January 2007)
361 (March 2007)
54 (January 2007)
1219 (March 2007)
RR 0.73 (0.23 to 2.25) (Jan 2007)
RR 0.31 (0.21 to 0.46) (Mar 2007)
The benefit with ITNs was still present at 12 months
Emami 2009 IRN City sector (approx. 3000 houses) Olyset® (permethrin 2%) distributed to all households in August 2004. P. sergenti Total sandflies
(monthly collections during transmission season using light traps and sticky traps).
Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported The authors state: 'There were statistically significant differences in the monthly catches of P. sergenti between control and intervention sectors in both cities (P < 0.05)'.
Joshi 2009 ASIA Hamlets or neighnourhoods PermaNet® (deltamethrin 55mg/m²) distributed to all households (date not stated). P. argentipes Mean number of sandflies per per house (light traps) per night at all sites pooled in Nepal, Bangladesh and India. 9.92
(date not stated)
9.41
(date not stated)
8.32
(5 months post intervention)
12.15
(5 months post intervention)
Pre‐intervention P = 0.798
Post‐intervention P = 0.16
 (The trial authors state the effect was significant in India and Bangladesh but not Nepal)

Abbreviations: IRN = Iran; BGD = Bangladesh; ITNs = insecticide treated nets; RR = risk ratio).