Comparison 11. Reservoir control versus IRS.
Outcome or subgroup title | No. of studies | No. of participants | Statistical method | Effect size |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 Seroconversions | 1 | Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI) | 0.56 [0.30, 1.02] | |
1.1 IRS of houses and animal pens versus IRS of houses | 1 | Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI) | 0.69 [0.27, 1.76] | |
1.2 IRS of houses and culling infected dogs versus IRS of houses | 1 | Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI) | 0.20 [0.05, 0.85] | |
1.3 IRS of houses and animal pens and culling infected dogs versus IRS of houses | 1 | Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI) | 0.69 [0.27, 1.76] |