Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 6;2015(8):CD008736. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008736.pub2

Comparison 11. Reservoir control versus IRS.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Seroconversions 1   Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI) 0.56 [0.30, 1.02]
1.1 IRS of houses and animal pens versus IRS of houses 1   Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI) 0.69 [0.27, 1.76]
1.2 IRS of houses and culling infected dogs versus IRS of houses 1   Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI) 0.20 [0.05, 0.85]
1.3 IRS of houses and animal pens and culling infected dogs versus IRS of houses 1   Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI) 0.69 [0.27, 1.76]