Table 2.

Percentage (%) of childhood obesity prevention studies showing favourable adiposity-related outcomes by primary intervention setting and type of intervention^*

Setting	Type of intervention, number of studies	% with statistically significant and favourable results (P < 0.05)				% with favourable results (P < 0.05 not necessary)
		Diet-only interventions	PA-only interventions	Combined diet–PA interventions	Total	Diet-only interventions	PA-only interventions	Combined diet–PA interventions	Total
School based	D, 5; PA, 25; C, 85; Total, 115	80	28	36	36	100	64	64	66
Home based	D, 1; PA, 0; C, 5; Total, 6	0	–	0	0	0	–	20	17
Primary care based	D, 0; PA, 0; C, 3; Total, 3	–	–	33	33	–	–	33	33
Child care based	D, 0; PA, 2; C, 3; Total, 5	–	50	33	40	–	50	33	40
Community based	D, 1; PA, 1; C, 8; Total, 10	100	0	50	50	100	0	63	60
Total	D, 7; PA, 28; C, 104; Total, 139	71	29	35	36	86	61	60	62

^*Our original KQ6/setting focused on consumer health informatics-based interventions. These results are reported here under other KQs based on primary setting.

C, diet–PA combined interventions; D, diet-only intervention; PA, PA-only intervention.