Table 4.

 Differences in failure rates between different diagnostic prediction models in AMUSE-2 cohort (with 95% confidence intervals based on 200 bootstrap samples)

Comparison (model 1 v model 2)	Difference between failure rates (model 1 v model 2)
Original Wells v simplified Wells	0.32% (−0.08% to 1.04%)
Original Wells v modified Wells	−0.02% (−0.04% to 0.00%)
Original Wells v original revised Geneva	−1.21% (−2.49% to 0.14%)
Original Wells v simplified revised Geneva	−1.67% (−3.21% to −0.27%)
Simplified Wells v modified Wells	−0.33% (−1.06% to 0.06%)
Simplified Wells v original revised Geneva	−1.53% (−2.80% to −0.36%)
Simplified Wells v simplified revised Geneva	−1.98% (−3.33% to −0.74%)
Modified Wells v original revised Geneva	−1.20% (−2.47% to 0.18%)
Modified Wells v simplified revised Geneva	−1.65% (−3.21% to −0.25%)
Original revised Geneva v simplified revised Geneva	−0.45% (−1.23% to 0.21%)