Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 27;25(10):2813–2820. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3695-2

Table 3.

AGD per exposure for FFDM and LE images for five compressed breast thickness categories and for all patients, p-values denote the significance of a pairwise comparison

Compressed breast thickness (mm) Number of patients FFDM AGD mean (mGy) ± SD (mGy) Range (mGy) LE CESM mean (mGy) ± SD (mGy) Range (mGy) Significance
<40 mm 13 1.15 0.24 0.69–1.75 1.6 0.3 1.0 – 2.0  <0.001
41–50 mm 31 1.3 0.3 0.9–2.6 1.8 0.1 1.5 – 2.5  <0.001
51–70 mm 87 1.8 0.3 1.1–2.8 2.5 0.6 1.6 – 3.6  <0.001
71–80 mm 13 2.0 0.3 1.4–2.7 3.22 0.12 3.03 – 3.52  <0.001
>81 mm 3 2.19 0.23 1.90–2.71 2.95 0.18 2.67 – 3.26  <0.001
All 147 1.7 0.4 0.7–2.8 2.3 0.7 1.0 – 3.6  <0.001

FFDM full-field digital mammography, CESM contrast-enhanced spectral mammography, AGD average glandular dose, LE low energy