Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 8;5:13723. doi: 10.1038/srep13723

Table 2. Modeling survival (ϕ) and recapture probabilities (p) of 183 adult burrowing owls. AICc: Akaike’s information criterion adjusted for effective sample size, ΔAICc: AICc difference between the current model and that with the lowest AICc value; wi: Akaike’s weight, NP: number of estimable parameters, deviance: relative deviance. Model notation: “+”: parallel variation, additive effect; “x”: interaction; “.” = constant (i.e. no effects considered); “habitat” = different parameters for urban and rural birds; “time” = between year differences.

Model Model structure AICc ΔAICc wi NP deviance
1 ϕ (habitat) p (time) 409.229 0.00 0.528 8 392.702
2 ϕ (habitat × time) p (time) 411.303 2.07 0.187 17 374.985
3 ϕ (habitat + time) p (time) 412.345 3.12 0.111 13 384.987
4 ϕ (habitat × time) p (habitat + time) 412.794 3.56 0.089 18 374.193
5 ϕ (habitat × time) p (habitat) 414.613 5.38 0.036 14 385.040
6 ϕ (habitat × time) p (.) 414.754 5.52 0.033 13 387.396
7 ϕ (habitat × time) p (time) 416.156 6.93 0.017 20 372.938
8 ϕ (.) p (time) 433.641 24.41 0.000 7 419.232
9 ϕ (t) p (time) 434.354 25.12 0.000 11 411.376