Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 8.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Factors. 2013 Feb;55(1):6–35. doi: 10.1177/0018720812465640

TABLE 4.

Proposed Sizing Plan for the Vest-Type Harness and the Adjustment Ranges (unit: mm) for Seven Harness-Strap Dimensions; Three Sizes Were Defined by Four Sizing Scores for Each Gender (men 0.9, 1.6, 2.515, 3.5; women: 0.3, 0.916, 2.016, 3.0)

Male Female
Size S
Harness component Lower Mean Upper Range Lower Mean Upper Range
Back strap (Figure 7d) 650 693 750 101 572 637 691 119
Chest strap (Figure 7e) 173 215 247 74 140 171 200 60
Front cross-chest strap (Figure 7f) 619 676 726 107 575 629 696 121
Front strap (Figure 7g) 520 586 633 114 517 562 612 95
Gluteal furrow arc (Figure 7h) 472 582 671 199 532 615 700 168
Thigh circumference (Figure 7i) 455 565 647 192 470 561 665 195
Troch-crotch circumference (Figure 7j) 563 691 762 199 577 669 781 204

Size M

Harness component
Back strap (Figure 7d) 679 737 818 139 603 674 745 142
Chest strap (Figure 7e) 200 239 280 80 157 190 228 71
Front cross-chest strap (Figure 7f) 661 734 811 150 610 676 754 143
Front strap (Figure 7g) 557 630 699 142 553 613 675 122
Gluteal furrow arc (Figure 7h) 558 624 715 157 568 644 753 184
Thigh circumference (Figure 7i) 546 617 732 186 525 614 736 211
Troch-crotch circumference (Figure 7j) 688 767 891 203 617 720 849 232

Size L

Harness component
Back strap (Figure 7d) 746 794 900 154 677 773 852 175
Chest strap (Figure 7e) 213 267 326 113 186 235 298 112
Front cross-chest strap (Figure 7f) 756 820 930 175 724 812 931 206
Front strap (Figure 7g) 641 692 787 146 631 723 802 172
Gluteal furrow arc (Figure 7h) 556 656 785 229 655 734 825 170
Thigh circumference (Figure 7i) 601 675 819 218 690 802 974 283
Troch-crotch circumference (Figure 7j) 764 854 992 228 806 929 1075 269

Note. See Figure 7d through 7j for a graphical description of harness components. The strap adjustment ranges were set to accommodate at least 95% of the estimated population within the specified size categories. The small size was set at 96.5% level (adjustable range = percentile 97.5 – percentile 1.0). The medium size was set at 95% level (adjustable range = percentile 97.5 – percentile 2.5), and the large size was set at 96.5% level (adjustable range = percentile 99 – percentile 2.5). The overall arrangement provides an opportunity to accommodate 98% of the estimated overall population.